linux-pwm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] pwm: spear: Remove unnecessary OOM messages
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 17:29:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <24037035.nXcZgi4Mc2@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohponXNmXPZP2Umz3BfRnXyOPX5Fa9606Lc42ORnOuevifEw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Viresh,

On Thursday 06 March 2014 00:17:38 Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 5 March 2014 19:00, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Sure, but I wasn't sure whether all error code paths in kmalloc() resulted
> > in an OOM message. For instance, the following code path results in an
> > allocation failure but doesn't seem to print an OOM message:
> > 
> > kmalloc
> > __kmalloc
> > __do_kmalloc
> > slab_alloc
> > slab_should_failslab
> > should_failslab
> > should_fail
> > 
> > A bit far-fetched possibly as it requires fault injection. I haven't found
> > any other such code path, but my understanding of that code is a bit
> > limited.
>
> In that case should we actually accept patches like this at all? As they
> might be ending up removing some useful print messages?

Dan has pointed out that I've missed the fail_dump() call in should_fail(). 
One could argue that fail_dump() wouldn't print any message if the fault 
injection framework has verbosity set to 0, but I suppose we can assume that 
people using the fault injection framework know what they're doing.

All other error paths in kmalloc() seem to result in a message being printed. 
I might have missed something, but I can trust the developers who know that 
code much better than I do that kmalloc() is designed to print an error 
message in all error paths. Any failure to print a message would be a 
kmalloc() bug that should be fixed, and getting rid of the allocation error 
messages in drivers would seem like a nice cleanup to me.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart


  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-05 16:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-26  0:59 [PATCH 0/9] pwm: Remove unnecessary OOM messages Jingoo Han
2014-02-26  1:02 ` [PATCH 1/9] pwm: ab8500: " Jingoo Han
2014-02-26  1:04 ` [PATCH 2/9] pwm: i.MX: " Jingoo Han
2014-02-26  1:06 ` [PATCH 3/9] pwm: pxa: " Jingoo Han
2014-02-26  1:08 ` [PATCH 4/9] pwm: renesas-tpu: " Jingoo Han
2014-02-26  2:22   ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-02-26  2:34     ` Jingoo Han
2014-02-26 22:02       ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-02-26  1:09 ` [PATCH 5/9] pwm: spear: " Jingoo Han
2014-02-26  4:49   ` Viresh Kumar
2014-02-26  4:57     ` Jingoo Han
2014-02-26  5:10       ` Viresh Kumar
2014-02-26  5:19         ` Joe Perches
2014-02-26  6:26           ` Viresh Kumar
2014-03-03  1:14             ` Jingoo Han
2014-03-03  9:53               ` Dan Carpenter
2014-03-05 11:00                 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-03-05 11:40                   ` Dan Carpenter
2014-03-05 16:17                   ` Viresh Kumar
2014-03-05 16:29                     ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2014-03-07  8:04                       ` Jingoo Han
2014-03-10 12:22                         ` Thierry Reding
2014-04-03  3:24                           ` Jingoo Han
2014-05-21 10:34                             ` Thierry Reding
2014-02-26  1:10 ` [PATCH 6/9] pwm: tegra: " Jingoo Han
2014-02-26  1:12 ` [PATCH 7/9] pwm: pwm-tiecap: " Jingoo Han
2014-02-26  1:13 ` [PATCH 8/9] pwm: tiehrpwm: " Jingoo Han
2014-02-26  1:14 ` [PATCH 9/9] pwm: vt8500: " Jingoo Han

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=24037035.nXcZgi4Mc2@avalon \
    --to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=jg1.han@samsung.com \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).