From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laurent Pinchart Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] arm64: dts: r8a7795-salvator-x: Enable PWM Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 10:59:30 +0300 Message-ID: <2637169.nvyUM18Pqy@avalon> References: <1492608293-12435-1-git-send-email-ulrich.hecht+renesas@gmail.com> <20170424074901.GB2047@verge.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from galahad.ideasonboard.com ([185.26.127.97]:42305 "EHLO galahad.ideasonboard.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1166305AbdDXH6Z (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Apr 2017 03:58:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20170424074901.GB2047@verge.net.au> Sender: linux-pwm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org To: Simon Horman Cc: Ulrich Hecht , Geert Uytterhoeven , Linux PWM List , Linux-Renesas , Magnus Damm , Takeshi Kihara Hi Simon, On Monday 24 Apr 2017 09:49:01 Simon Horman wrote: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 09:26:04AM +0200, Ulrich Hecht wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > And we already have a correct v3 from you in patchwork: > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8711801/ > > > > Whoops... > > > > In my defense, that was over a year ago. Simon, any reason this didn't > > make it in? > > Given it was over a year ago I hope you can understand that I don't recall > why this wasn't accepted. It is entirely possible that it was an oversight > on my part in which case I apologise - I am not a machine and I make > mistakes. > > I see that patches 3/5 and 4/5 also need updating. > Could you repost them along with this patch with the review comments > addressed? I will try not to let them slip through the cracks again. How about using pwm1 for backlight as done in "[PATCH v2 09/13] arm64: dts: r8a7795: salvator-x: Add panel backlight support" ? -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart