[PATCH 0/2] pwm: Make use of regmap_{set,clear}_bits()

[PATCH 0/2] pwm: Make use of regmap_{set,clear}_bits()

[Uwe Kleine-König]

Hello,

during the final look over Trevor's axi-pwmgen patch I found an opportunity to
use regmap_clear_bits(). Looking through the other drivers I found another
patch opportunity in the jz4740 driver.

Best regards
Uwe

Uwe Kleine-König (2):
  pwm: jz4740: Another few conversions to regmap_{set,clear}_bits()
  pwm: axi-pwmgen: Make use of regmap_clear_bits()

 drivers/pwm/pwm-axi-pwmgen.c | 2 +-
 drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c     | 9 ++++-----
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

base-commit: 7cf775737d4ec337e46bf8497882cb6a7650839a
-- 
2.43.0

[PATCH 1/2] pwm: jz4740: Another few conversions to regmap_{set,clear}_bits()

[Uwe Kleine-König]

Similar to commit 7d9199995412 ("pwm: jz4740: Use
regmap_{set,clear}_bits") convert two more regmap_update_bits() calls to
regmap_{set,clear}_bits() which were missed back then.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c
index da4bf543d357..6bdb01619380 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c
@@ -201,12 +201,11 @@ static int jz4740_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 	 * state instead of its inactive state.
 	 */
 	if ((state->polarity == PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL) ^ state->enabled)
-		regmap_update_bits(jz->map, TCU_REG_TCSRc(pwm->hwpwm),
-				   TCU_TCSR_PWM_INITL_HIGH, 0);
+		regmap_clear_bits(jz->map, TCU_REG_TCSRc(pwm->hwpwm),
+				  TCU_TCSR_PWM_INITL_HIGH);
 	else
-		regmap_update_bits(jz->map, TCU_REG_TCSRc(pwm->hwpwm),
-				   TCU_TCSR_PWM_INITL_HIGH,
-				   TCU_TCSR_PWM_INITL_HIGH);
+		regmap_set_bits(jz->map, TCU_REG_TCSRc(pwm->hwpwm),
+				TCU_TCSR_PWM_INITL_HIGH);
 
 	if (state->enabled)
 		jz4740_pwm_enable(chip, pwm);
-- 
2.43.0

[PATCH 2/2] pwm: axi-pwmgen: Make use of regmap_clear_bits()

[Uwe Kleine-König]

Instead of using regmap_update_bits() and passing val=0, better use
regmap_clear_bits().

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-axi-pwmgen.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-axi-pwmgen.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-axi-pwmgen.c
index 1bd4150e0158..aac4f395497b 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-axi-pwmgen.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-axi-pwmgen.c
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static int axi_pwmgen_setup(struct regmap *regmap, struct device *dev)
 	}
 
 	/* Enable the core */
-	ret = regmap_update_bits(regmap, AXI_PWMGEN_REG_CONFIG, AXI_PWMGEN_REG_CONFIG_RESET, 0);
+	ret = regmap_clear_bits(regmap, AXI_PWMGEN_REG_CONFIG, AXI_PWMGEN_REG_CONFIG_RESET);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-- 
2.43.0

Re: [PATCH 2/2] pwm: axi-pwmgen: Make use of regmap_clear_bits()

[Trevor Gamblin]

On 2024-06-06 12:40 p.m., Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Instead of using regmap_update_bits() and passing val=0, better use
> regmap_clear_bits().
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
Acked-by: Trevor Gamblin <tgamblin@baylibre.com>
> ---
>   drivers/pwm/pwm-axi-pwmgen.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-axi-pwmgen.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-axi-pwmgen.c
> index 1bd4150e0158..aac4f395497b 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-axi-pwmgen.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-axi-pwmgen.c
> @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static int axi_pwmgen_setup(struct regmap *regmap, struct device *dev)
>   	}
>   
>   	/* Enable the core */
> -	ret = regmap_update_bits(regmap, AXI_PWMGEN_REG_CONFIG, AXI_PWMGEN_REG_CONFIG_RESET, 0);
> +	ret = regmap_clear_bits(regmap, AXI_PWMGEN_REG_CONFIG, AXI_PWMGEN_REG_CONFIG_RESET);
>   	if (ret)
>   		return ret;
>   

Re: [PATCH 2/2] pwm: axi-pwmgen: Make use of regmap_clear_bits()

[Nuno Sá]

On Thu, 2024-06-06 at 18:40 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Instead of using regmap_update_bits() and passing val=0, better use
> regmap_clear_bits().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>

>  drivers/pwm/pwm-axi-pwmgen.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-axi-pwmgen.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-axi-pwmgen.c
> index 1bd4150e0158..aac4f395497b 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-axi-pwmgen.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-axi-pwmgen.c
> @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static int axi_pwmgen_setup(struct regmap *regmap, struct
> device *dev)
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Enable the core */
> -	ret = regmap_update_bits(regmap, AXI_PWMGEN_REG_CONFIG,
> AXI_PWMGEN_REG_CONFIG_RESET, 0);
> +	ret = regmap_clear_bits(regmap, AXI_PWMGEN_REG_CONFIG,
> AXI_PWMGEN_REG_CONFIG_RESET);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  

Re: [PATCH 1/2] pwm: jz4740: Another few conversions to regmap_{set,clear}_bits()

[Paul Cercueil]

Hi Uwe,

Le jeudi 06 juin 2024 à 18:40 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König a écrit :
> Similar to commit 7d9199995412 ("pwm: jz4740: Use
> regmap_{set,clear}_bits") convert two more regmap_update_bits() calls
> to
> regmap_{set,clear}_bits() which were missed back then.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>

Reviewed-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>

Thanks!

Cheers,
-Paul

> ---
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c | 9 ++++-----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c
> index da4bf543d357..6bdb01619380 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c
> @@ -201,12 +201,11 @@ static int jz4740_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip
> *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
>  	 * state instead of its inactive state.
>  	 */
>  	if ((state->polarity == PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL) ^ state-
> >enabled)
> -		regmap_update_bits(jz->map, TCU_REG_TCSRc(pwm-
> >hwpwm),
> -				   TCU_TCSR_PWM_INITL_HIGH, 0);
> +		regmap_clear_bits(jz->map, TCU_REG_TCSRc(pwm-
> >hwpwm),
> +				  TCU_TCSR_PWM_INITL_HIGH);
>  	else
> -		regmap_update_bits(jz->map, TCU_REG_TCSRc(pwm-
> >hwpwm),
> -				   TCU_TCSR_PWM_INITL_HIGH,
> -				   TCU_TCSR_PWM_INITL_HIGH);
> +		regmap_set_bits(jz->map, TCU_REG_TCSRc(pwm->hwpwm),
> +				TCU_TCSR_PWM_INITL_HIGH);
>  
>  	if (state->enabled)
>  		jz4740_pwm_enable(chip, pwm);

Re: [PATCH 2/2] pwm: axi-pwmgen: Make use of regmap_clear_bits()

[Uwe Kleine-König]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 757 bytes --]

Hello Nuno,

On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 08:40:32AM +0200, Nuno Sá wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-06-06 at 18:40 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > Instead of using regmap_update_bits() and passing val=0, better use
> > regmap_clear_bits().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
> > ---
> 
> Reviewed-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>

Thanks for looking at the patch. When I apply it (using b4) I get
however:

NOTE: some trailers ignored due to from/email mismatches:
    ! Trailer: Reviewed-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>
     Msg From: Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@gmail.com>

I'll add it anyhow, but it would be great if you fixed your workflow to
have the sender match the address in the tag.

Best regards
Uwe


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 2/2] pwm: axi-pwmgen: Make use of regmap_clear_bits()

[Conor Dooley]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 928 bytes --]

On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 07:53:33AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Nuno,
> 
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 08:40:32AM +0200, Nuno Sá wrote:
> > On Thu, 2024-06-06 at 18:40 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > Instead of using regmap_update_bits() and passing val=0, better use
> > > regmap_clear_bits().
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
> > > ---
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>
> 
> Thanks for looking at the patch. When I apply it (using b4) I get
> however:
> 
> NOTE: some trailers ignored due to from/email mismatches:
>     ! Trailer: Reviewed-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>
>      Msg From: Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@gmail.com>
> 
> I'll add it anyhow, but it would be great if you fixed your workflow to
> have the sender match the address in the tag.

I'm curious, given I do this all the time, do you not see similar issues
for me?

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 2/2] pwm: axi-pwmgen: Make use of regmap_clear_bits()

[Nuno Sá]

On Mon, 2024-06-10 at 07:53 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Nuno,
> 
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 08:40:32AM +0200, Nuno Sá wrote:
> > On Thu, 2024-06-06 at 18:40 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > Instead of using regmap_update_bits() and passing val=0, better use
> > > regmap_clear_bits().
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
> > > ---
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>
> 
> Thanks for looking at the patch. When I apply it (using b4) I get
> however:
> 
> NOTE: some trailers ignored due to from/email mismatches:
>     ! Trailer: Reviewed-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>
>      Msg From: Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@gmail.com>
> 
> I'll add it anyhow, but it would be great if you fixed your workflow to
> have the sender match the address in the tag.
> 

Yeah, I'm aware of it. Sending emails from my corporate email is just too
painful that I use my personal one and an email client that actually fits kernel
development. Til now, it was never an issue and this is the first "complain" I'm
getting :). I'll try to remember this for pwm in the future...

Sorry for the trouble!
- Nuno Sá 

Re: [PATCH 2/2] pwm: axi-pwmgen: Make use of regmap_clear_bits()

[Uwe Kleine-König]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1251 bytes --]

On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 09:00:53AM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 07:53:33AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > Hello Nuno,
> > 
> > On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 08:40:32AM +0200, Nuno Sá wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2024-06-06 at 18:40 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > > Instead of using regmap_update_bits() and passing val=0, better use
> > > > regmap_clear_bits().
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
> > > > ---
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>
> > 
> > Thanks for looking at the patch. When I apply it (using b4) I get
> > however:
> > 
> > NOTE: some trailers ignored due to from/email mismatches:
> >     ! Trailer: Reviewed-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>
> >      Msg From: Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@gmail.com>
> > 
> > I'll add it anyhow, but it would be great if you fixed your workflow to
> > have the sender match the address in the tag.
> 
> I'm curious, given I do this all the time, do you not see similar issues
> for me?

Never noticed that for you. Maybe that's a new check in b4? I recently
reinstalled my devel machine, so I likely have a new version even if the
upstream change is a bit older already.

Best regards
Uwe

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 2/2] pwm: axi-pwmgen: Make use of regmap_clear_bits()

[Conor Dooley]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1557 bytes --]

On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 10:32:13AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 09:00:53AM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 07:53:33AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > Hello Nuno,
> > > 
> > > On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 08:40:32AM +0200, Nuno Sá wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2024-06-06 at 18:40 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > > > Instead of using regmap_update_bits() and passing val=0, better use
> > > > > regmap_clear_bits().
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > 
> > > > Reviewed-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>
> > > 
> > > Thanks for looking at the patch. When I apply it (using b4) I get
> > > however:
> > > 
> > > NOTE: some trailers ignored due to from/email mismatches:
> > >     ! Trailer: Reviewed-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>
> > >      Msg From: Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@gmail.com>
> > > 
> > > I'll add it anyhow, but it would be great if you fixed your workflow to
> > > have the sender match the address in the tag.
> > 
> > I'm curious, given I do this all the time, do you not see similar issues
> > for me?
> 
> Never noticed that for you. Maybe that's a new check in b4? I recently
> reinstalled my devel machine, so I likely have a new version even if the
> upstream change is a bit older already.

Nah, I think that's been in b4 for as long as I have been using it, even
when I used the old version from debian. Maybe my use of patatt is the
reason or some exemption for kernel.org addresses.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]