From: "Nuno Sá" <noname.nuno@gmail.com>
To: radu.sabau@analog.com, "Lars-Peter Clausen" <lars@metafoo.de>,
"Michael Hennerich" <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>,
"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <ukleinek@kernel.org>,
"Liam Girdwood" <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"Linus Walleij" <linusw@kernel.org>,
"Bartosz Golaszewski" <brgl@kernel.org>,
"Philipp Zabel" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] iio: adc: ad4691: add initial driver for AD4691 family
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 11:44:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3f7cfb4baf2b92cf13b2d7f97f0e77027f4b917a.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260320-ad4692-multichannel-sar-adc-driver-v4-2-052c1050507a@analog.com>
Hi Radu,
minor comments on top of what was said already,
On Fri, 2026-03-20 at 13:03 +0200, Radu Sabau via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Radu Sabau <radu.sabau@analog.com>
>
> Add support for the Analog Devices AD4691 family of high-speed,
> low-power multichannel SAR ADCs: AD4691 (16-ch, 500 kSPS),
> AD4692 (16-ch, 1 MSPS), AD4693 (8-ch, 500 kSPS) and
> AD4694 (8-ch, 1 MSPS).
>
> The driver implements a custom regmap layer over raw SPI to handle the
> device's mixed 1/2/3/4-byte register widths and uses the standard IIO
> read_raw/write_raw interface for single-channel reads.
>
> The chip idles in Autonomous Mode so that single-shot read_raw can use
> the internal oscillator without disturbing the hardware configuration.
>
> Three voltage supply domains are managed: avdd (required), vio, and a
> reference supply on either the REF pin (ref-supply, external buffer)
> or the REFIN pin (refin-supply, uses the on-chip reference buffer;
> REFBUF_EN is set accordingly). Hardware reset is performed via
> the reset controller framework; a software reset through SPI_CONFIG_A
> is used as fallback when no hardware reset is available.
>
> Accumulator channel masking for single-shot reads uses ACC_MASK_REG via
> an ADDR_DESCENDING SPI write, which covers both mask bytes in a single
> 16-bit transfer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Radu Sabau <radu.sabau@analog.com>
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig | 11 +
> drivers/iio/adc/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/iio/adc/ad4691.c | 686 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 699 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 438ca850fa1c..24e4502b8292 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -1490,6 +1490,7 @@ L: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
> S: Supported
> W: https://ez.analog.com/linux-software-drivers
> F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad4691.yaml
> +F: drivers/iio/adc/ad4691.c
>
...
>
> +
> +struct ad4691_state {
> + const struct ad4691_chip_info *info;
> + struct regmap *regmap;
> + int vref_uV;
> + bool refbuf_en;
> + bool ldo_en;
> + /*
> + * Synchronize access to members of the driver state, and ensure
> + * atomicity of consecutive SPI operations.
> + */
> + struct mutex lock;
> +};
I would not use tabs and align all the members. Makes thinks harder in the future if
an update is needed. I would just use a simple space.
> +
> +static int ad4691_reg_read(void *context, unsigned int reg, unsigned int *val)
> +{
> + struct spi_device *spi = context;
> + u8 tx[2], rx[4];
> + int ret;
> +
> + put_unaligned_be16(0x8000 | reg, tx);
> +
> + switch (reg) {
> + case 0 ... AD4691_OSC_FREQ_REG:
> + case AD4691_SPARE_CONTROL ... AD4691_ACC_SAT_OVR_REG(15):
> + ret = spi_write_then_read(spi, tx, 2, rx, 1);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + *val = rx[0];
> + return 0;
> + case AD4691_STD_SEQ_CONFIG:
> + case AD4691_AVG_IN(0) ... AD4691_AVG_IN(15):
> + ret = spi_write_then_read(spi, tx, 2, rx, 2);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + *val = get_unaligned_be16(rx);
> + return 0;
> + case AD4691_AVG_STS_IN(0) ... AD4691_AVG_STS_IN(15):
> + case AD4691_ACC_IN(0) ... AD4691_ACC_IN(15):
> + ret = spi_write_then_read(spi, tx, 2, rx, 3);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + *val = get_unaligned_be24(rx);
> + return 0;
> + case AD4691_ACC_STS_DATA(0) ... AD4691_ACC_STS_DATA(15):
> + ret = spi_write_then_read(spi, tx, 2, rx, 4);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + *val = get_unaligned_be32(rx);
> + return 0;
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static int ad4691_reg_write(void *context, unsigned int reg, unsigned int val)
> +{
> + struct spi_device *spi = context;
> + u8 tx[4];
> +
> + put_unaligned_be16(reg, tx);
> +
> + switch (reg) {
> + case 0 ... AD4691_OSC_FREQ_REG:
> + case AD4691_SPARE_CONTROL ... AD4691_ACC_MASK_REG - 1:
> + case AD4691_ACC_MASK_REG + 1 ... AD4691_GPIO_MODE2_REG:
> + if (val > 0xFF)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + tx[2] = val;
> + return spi_write_then_read(spi, tx, 3, NULL, 0);
> + case AD4691_ACC_MASK_REG:
> + case AD4691_STD_SEQ_CONFIG:
> + if (val > 0xFFFF)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + put_unaligned_be16(val, &tx[2]);
> + return spi_write_then_read(spi, tx, 4, NULL, 0);
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static bool ad4691_volatile_reg(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
> +{
> + switch (reg) {
> + case AD4691_STATUS_REG:
> + case AD4691_CLAMP_STATUS1_REG:
> + case AD4691_CLAMP_STATUS2_REG:
> + case AD4691_GPIO_READ:
> + case AD4691_ACC_STATUS_FULL1_REG ... AD4691_ACC_STATUS_SAT2_REG:
> + case AD4691_ACC_SAT_OVR_REG(0) ... AD4691_ACC_SAT_OVR_REG(15):
> + case AD4691_AVG_IN(0) ... AD4691_AVG_IN(15):
> + case AD4691_AVG_STS_IN(0) ... AD4691_AVG_STS_IN(15):
> + case AD4691_ACC_IN(0) ... AD4691_ACC_IN(15):
> + case AD4691_ACC_STS_DATA(0) ... AD4691_ACC_STS_DATA(15):
> + return true;
> + default:
> + return false;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static bool ad4691_readable_reg(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
> +{
> + switch (reg) {
> + case 0 ... AD4691_OSC_FREQ_REG:
> + case AD4691_SPARE_CONTROL ... AD4691_ACC_SAT_OVR_REG(15):
> + case AD4691_STD_SEQ_CONFIG:
> + case AD4691_AVG_IN(0) ... AD4691_AVG_IN(15):
> + case AD4691_AVG_STS_IN(0) ... AD4691_AVG_STS_IN(15):
> + case AD4691_ACC_IN(0) ... AD4691_ACC_IN(15):
> + case AD4691_ACC_STS_DATA(0) ... AD4691_ACC_STS_DATA(15):
> + return true;
> + default:
> + return false;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static bool ad4691_writeable_reg(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
> +{
> + switch (reg) {
> + case 0 ... AD4691_OSC_FREQ_REG:
> + case AD4691_STD_SEQ_CONFIG:
> + case AD4691_SPARE_CONTROL ... AD4691_GPIO_MODE2_REG:
> + return true;
> + default:
> + return false;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static const struct regmap_config ad4691_regmap_config = {
> + .reg_bits = 16,
> + .val_bits = 32,
> + .reg_read = ad4691_reg_read,
> + .reg_write = ad4691_reg_write,
> + .volatile_reg = ad4691_volatile_reg,
> + .readable_reg = ad4691_readable_reg,
> + .writeable_reg = ad4691_writeable_reg,
> + .max_register = AD4691_ACC_STS_DATA(15),
> + .cache_type = REGCACHE_MAPLE,
> +};
> +
> +static int ad4691_get_sampling_freq(struct ad4691_state *st, int *val)
> +{
> + unsigned int reg_val;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = regmap_read(st->regmap, AD4691_OSC_FREQ_REG, ®_val);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + *val = ad4691_osc_freqs[FIELD_GET(AD4691_OSC_FREQ_MASK, reg_val)];
> + return IIO_VAL_INT;
> +}
> +
> +static int ad4691_set_sampling_freq(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, int freq)
> +{
> + struct ad4691_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> + unsigned int start = (st->info->max_rate == HZ_PER_MHZ) ? 0 : 1;
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + IIO_DEV_ACQUIRE_DIRECT_MODE(indio_dev, claim);
> + if (IIO_DEV_ACQUIRE_FAILED(claim))
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> + for (i = start; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ad4691_osc_freqs); i++) {
> + if ((int)ad4691_osc_freqs[i] == freq)
maybe just make the array signed.
> + return regmap_update_bits(st->regmap, AD4691_OSC_FREQ_REG,
> + AD4691_OSC_FREQ_MASK, i);
> + }
> +
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static int ad4691_read_avail(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> + struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
> + const int **vals, int *type,
> + int *length, long mask)
> +{
> + struct ad4691_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> + unsigned int start = (st->info->max_rate == HZ_PER_MHZ) ? 0 : 1;
> +
> + switch (mask) {
> + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
> + *vals = (const int *)&ad4691_osc_freqs[start];
> + *type = IIO_VAL_INT;
> + *length = ARRAY_SIZE(ad4691_osc_freqs) - start;
> + return IIO_AVAIL_LIST;
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static int ad4691_single_shot_read(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> + struct iio_chan_spec const *chan, int *val)
> +{
> + struct ad4691_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> + unsigned int reg_val;
> + int ret;
> +
> + guard(mutex)(&st->lock);
> +
> + /*
> + * Use AUTONOMOUS mode for single-shot reads. The chip always
> + * operates in AUTONOMOUS mode in this driver revision.
> + */
> + ret = regmap_write(st->regmap, AD4691_STATE_RESET_REG,
> + AD4691_STATE_RESET_ALL);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = regmap_write(st->regmap, AD4691_STD_SEQ_CONFIG,
> + BIT(chan->channel));
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = regmap_write(st->regmap, AD4691_ACC_MASK_REG,
> + (u16)~BIT(chan->channel));
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = regmap_read(st->regmap, AD4691_OSC_FREQ_REG, ®_val);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = regmap_write(st->regmap, AD4691_OSC_EN_REG, 1);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /*
> + * Wait for at least 2 internal oscillator periods for the
> + * conversion to complete.
> + */
> + fsleep(DIV_ROUND_UP(2 * USEC_PER_SEC,
> + ad4691_osc_freqs[FIELD_GET(AD4691_OSC_FREQ_MASK,
> + reg_val)]));
> +
> + ret = regmap_write(st->regmap, AD4691_OSC_EN_REG, 0);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = regmap_read(st->regmap, AD4691_AVG_IN(chan->channel), ®_val);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + *val = reg_val;
> +
> + ret = regmap_write(st->regmap, AD4691_STATE_RESET_REG, AD4691_STATE_RESET_ALL);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return IIO_VAL_INT;
> +}
> +
> +static int ad4691_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> + struct iio_chan_spec const *chan, int *val,
> + int *val2, long info)
> +{
> + struct ad4691_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> +
> + switch (info) {
> + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW: {
> + IIO_DEV_ACQUIRE_DIRECT_MODE(indio_dev, claim);
> +
nit: I would drop the extra new line. The check below is related to the
above.
> + if (IIO_DEV_ACQUIRE_FAILED(claim))
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> + return ad4691_single_shot_read(indio_dev, chan, val);
> + }
> + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
> + return ad4691_get_sampling_freq(st, val);
> + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
> + *val = st->vref_uV / (MICRO / MILLI);
> + *val2 = chan->scan_type.realbits;
> + return IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2;
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static int ad4691_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> + struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
> + int val, int val2, long mask)
> +{
> + switch (mask) {
> + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
> + return ad4691_set_sampling_freq(indio_dev, val);
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static int ad4691_reg_access(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, unsigned int reg,
> + unsigned int writeval, unsigned int *readval)
> +{
> + struct ad4691_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> +
> + guard(mutex)(&st->lock);
> +
> + if (readval)
> + return regmap_read(st->regmap, reg, readval);
> +
> + return regmap_write(st->regmap, reg, writeval);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct iio_info ad4691_info = {
> + .read_raw = &ad4691_read_raw,
> + .write_raw = &ad4691_write_raw,
> + .read_avail = &ad4691_read_avail,
> + .debugfs_reg_access = &ad4691_reg_access,
> +};
> +
> +static int ad4691_regulator_setup(struct ad4691_state *st)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = regmap_get_device(st->regmap);
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = devm_regulator_get_enable(dev, "avdd");
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to get and enable AVDD\n");
> +
> + ret = devm_regulator_get_enable(dev, "ldo-in");
> + if (ret && ret != -ENODEV)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to get and enable LDO-IN\n");
> + st->ldo_en = (ret == -ENODEV);
> +
> + ret = devm_regulator_get_enable(dev, "vio");
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to get and enable VIO\n");
> +
> + st->vref_uV = devm_regulator_get_enable_read_voltage(dev, "ref");
> + if (st->vref_uV >= 0) {
> + st->refbuf_en = false;
> + } else if (st->vref_uV == -ENODEV) {
> + st->vref_uV = devm_regulator_get_enable_read_voltage(dev, "refin");
> + st->refbuf_en = true;
> + }
> + if (st->vref_uV < 0)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, st->vref_uV,
> + "Failed to get reference supply\n");
> +
> + if (st->vref_uV < AD4691_VREF_uV_MIN || st->vref_uV > AD4691_VREF_uV_MAX)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL,
> + "vref(%d) must be in the range [%u...%u]\n",
> + st->vref_uV, AD4691_VREF_uV_MIN,
> + AD4691_VREF_uV_MAX);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ad4691_reset(struct ad4691_state *st)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = regmap_get_device(st->regmap);
> + struct reset_control *rst;
> +
> + rst = devm_reset_control_get_optional_exclusive(dev, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(rst))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(rst), "Failed to get reset\n");
> +
> + if (!rst)
> + /* No hardware reset available, fall back to software reset. */
> + return regmap_write(st->regmap, AD4691_SPI_CONFIG_A_REG,
> + AD4691_SW_RESET);
> +
> + reset_control_assert(rst);
Can't we ask for the reset in the asserted state already?
> + /* Reset delay required. See datasheet Table 5. */
> + fsleep(300);
> + reset_control_deassert(rst);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ad4691_config(struct ad4691_state *st)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = regmap_get_device(st->regmap);
> + enum ad4691_ref_ctrl ref_val;
> + int ret;
> +
> + switch (st->vref_uV) {
> + case AD4691_VREF_uV_MIN ... AD4691_VREF_2P5_uV_MAX:
> + ref_val = AD4691_VREF_2P5;
> + break;
> + case AD4691_VREF_2P5_uV_MAX + 1 ... AD4691_VREF_3P0_uV_MAX:
> + ref_val = AD4691_VREF_3P0;
> + break;
> + case AD4691_VREF_3P0_uV_MAX + 1 ... AD4691_VREF_3P3_uV_MAX:
> + ref_val = AD4691_VREF_3P3;
> + break;
> + case AD4691_VREF_3P3_uV_MAX + 1 ... AD4691_VREF_4P096_uV_MAX:
> + ref_val = AD4691_VREF_4P096;
> + break;
> + case AD4691_VREF_4P096_uV_MAX + 1 ... AD4691_VREF_uV_MAX:
> + ref_val = AD4691_VREF_5P0;
> + break;
> + default:
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL,
> + "Unsupported vref voltage: %d uV\n",
> + st->vref_uV);
> + }
> +
> + ret = regmap_write(st->regmap, AD4691_REF_CTRL,
> + FIELD_PREP(AD4691_REF_CTRL_MASK, ref_val) |
> + (st->refbuf_en ? AD4691_REFBUF_EN : 0));
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to write REF_CTRL\n");
> +
> + ret = regmap_write(st->regmap, AD4691_DEVICE_SETUP,
> + st->ldo_en ? AD4691_LDO_EN : 0);
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to write DEVICE_SETUP\n");
> +
> + /*
> + * Set the internal oscillator to the highest valid rate for this chip.
> + * Index 0 (1 MHz) is valid only for AD4692/AD4694; AD4691/AD4693 start
> + * at index 1 (500 kHz).
> + */
> + ret = regmap_write(st->regmap, AD4691_OSC_FREQ_REG,
> + (st->info->max_rate == HZ_PER_MHZ) ? 0 : 1);
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to write OSC_FREQ\n");
> +
> + /* Device always operates in AUTONOMOUS mode. */
Kind of obvious from the code. Drop the comment please.
- Nuno Sá
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-23 11:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-20 11:03 [PATCH v4 0/4] iio: adc: ad4691: add driver for AD4691 multichannel SAR ADC family Radu Sabau via B4 Relay
2026-03-20 11:03 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: iio: adc: add AD4691 family Radu Sabau via B4 Relay
2026-03-20 12:26 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-03-21 14:35 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-03-21 16:11 ` David Lechner
2026-03-20 11:03 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] iio: adc: ad4691: add initial driver for " Radu Sabau via B4 Relay
2026-03-20 15:16 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-03-21 14:48 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-03-23 11:44 ` Nuno Sá [this message]
2026-03-20 11:03 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] iio: adc: ad4691: add triggered buffer support Radu Sabau via B4 Relay
2026-03-20 16:14 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2026-03-21 15:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-03-23 9:03 ` Sabau, Radu bogdan
2026-03-24 12:22 ` Nuno Sá
2026-03-25 12:47 ` Sabau, Radu bogdan
2026-03-25 13:12 ` Nuno Sá
2026-03-20 11:03 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] iio: adc: ad4691: add SPI offload support Radu Sabau via B4 Relay
2026-03-20 17:07 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-03-21 15:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-03-22 3:05 ` kernel test robot
2026-03-23 13:06 ` kernel test robot
2026-03-25 11:32 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3f7cfb4baf2b92cf13b2d7f97f0e77027f4b917a.camel@gmail.com \
--to=noname.nuno@gmail.com \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=brgl@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=radu.sabau@analog.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=ukleinek@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox