From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <52375FDB.8090405@wwwdotorg.org> Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:45:31 -0600 From: Stephen Warren MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PWM: PXA: add device tree support to PWM driver References: <1379091281-23662-1-git-send-email-mikedunn@newsguy.com> <201309151607.04244.marex@denx.de> <523718D3.4050003@newsguy.com> <201309161710.15800.marex@denx.de> In-Reply-To: <201309161710.15800.marex@denx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: To: Marek Vasut Cc: Mike Dunn , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Grant Likely , Thierry Reding , Rob Herring , Haojian Zhuang , Robert Jarzmik , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Dmitry Torokhov , Chao Xie , Sergei Shtylyov , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell On 09/16/2013 09:10 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: ... > OK, to push it ad-absurdum, shall we not start listing every single revision of > the CPU as well? Like pxa250a0 250a1 etc ? Yes , this many-to-one mapping is It's not about CPU revisions, it's about revisions of the SoC that contain the IP block. > something I don't quite understand, that's why I'd love to see a good reasoning > from Stephen. Please see the earlier discussions.