From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Wahren Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] leds/pwm: Don't disable pwm when setting brightness to 0 Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:13:26 +0100 Message-ID: <54ED8426.6090401@i2se.com> References: <1423734290-19750-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <1423734290-19750-3-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <1151818200.134325.1424804213026.JavaMail.open-xchange@oxbsltgw03.schlund.de> <20150224190636.GG7789@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150224190636.GG7789@pengutronix.de> Sender: linux-leds-owner@vger.kernel.org To: =?windows-1252?Q?Uwe_Kleine-K=F6nig?= Cc: Bryan Wu , Thierry Reding , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, Richard Purdie , Sascha Hauer , kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org Hi Uwe, Am 24.02.2015 um 20:06 schrieb Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig: > Hello Stefan, > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 07:56:52PM +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote: >> After replacing "i" with "priv->num_leds" in this patch we are able = to use pwm >> led with trigger heartbeat. > Right, that's what I did in my tree to to please the build robot :-) in that case, here is my: Tested-by: Stefan Wahren >> This is the functional part of this issue, since the warning has bee= n fixed [1] > Can I interpret this as an Tested-by: for this patch and an Ack for > patch 1? Sorry, but i don't think i'm the right person for acking patch 1. Stefan > Best regards > Uwe >