From: Trevor Gamblin <tgamblin@baylibre.com>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
"Kent Gibson" <warthog618@gmail.com>,
"Michael Hennerich" <michael.hennerich@analog.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/8] pwm: axi-pwmgen: Implementation of the waveform callbacks
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 09:29:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <837e623d-029b-4232-962c-6fb0ba75ca95@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <922277f07b1d1fb9c9cd915b1ec3fdeec888a916.1726819463.git.u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
On 2024-09-20 04:58, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Convert the axi-pwmgen driver to use the new callbacks for hardware
> programming.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
Tested-by: Trevor Gamblin <tgamblin@baylibre.com>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-axi-pwmgen.c | 154 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 108 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-axi-pwmgen.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-axi-pwmgen.c
> index b5477659ba18..39d184417c7c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-axi-pwmgen.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-axi-pwmgen.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> #include <linux/err.h>
> #include <linux/fpga/adi-axi-common.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/minmax.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/pwm.h>
> @@ -53,81 +54,142 @@ static const struct regmap_config axi_pwmgen_regmap_config = {
> .max_register = 0xFC,
> };
>
> -static int axi_pwmgen_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> - const struct pwm_state *state)
> +/* This represents a hardware configuration for one channel */
> +struct axi_pwmgen_waveform {
> + u32 period_cnt;
> + u32 duty_cycle_cnt;
> + u32 duty_offset_cnt;
> +};
> +
> +static int axi_pwmgen_round_waveform_tohw(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> + struct pwm_device *pwm,
> + const struct pwm_waveform *wf,
> + void *_wfhw)
> {
> + struct axi_pwmgen_waveform *wfhw = _wfhw;
> + struct axi_pwmgen_ddata *ddata = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
> +
> + if (wf->period_length_ns == 0) {
> + *wfhw = (struct axi_pwmgen_waveform){
> + .period_cnt = 0,
> + .duty_cycle_cnt = 0,
> + .duty_offset_cnt = 0,
> + };
> + } else {
> + /* With ddata->clk_rate_hz < NSEC_PER_SEC this won't overflow. */
> + wfhw->period_cnt = min_t(u64,
> + mul_u64_u32_div(wf->period_length_ns, ddata->clk_rate_hz, NSEC_PER_SEC),
> + U32_MAX);
> +
> + if (wfhw->period_cnt == 0) {
> + /*
> + * The specified period is too short for the hardware.
> + * Let's round .duty_cycle down to 0 to get a (somewhat)
> + * valid result.
> + */
> + wfhw->period_cnt = 1;
> + wfhw->duty_cycle_cnt = 0;
> + wfhw->duty_offset_cnt = 0;
> + } else {
> + wfhw->duty_cycle_cnt = min_t(u64,
> + mul_u64_u32_div(wf->duty_length_ns, ddata->clk_rate_hz, NSEC_PER_SEC),
> + U32_MAX);
> + wfhw->duty_offset_cnt = min_t(u64,
> + mul_u64_u32_div(wf->duty_offset_ns, ddata->clk_rate_hz, NSEC_PER_SEC),
> + U32_MAX);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + dev_dbg(&chip->dev, "pwm#%u: %lld/%lld [+%lld] @%lu -> PERIOD: %08x, DUTY: %08x, OFFSET: %08x\n",
> + pwm->hwpwm, wf->duty_length_ns, wf->period_length_ns, wf->duty_offset_ns,
> + ddata->clk_rate_hz, wfhw->period_cnt, wfhw->duty_cycle_cnt, wfhw->duty_offset_cnt);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int axi_pwmgen_round_waveform_fromhw(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> + const void *_wfhw, struct pwm_waveform *wf)
> +{
> + const struct axi_pwmgen_waveform *wfhw = _wfhw;
> + struct axi_pwmgen_ddata *ddata = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
> +
> + wf->period_length_ns = DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP((u64)wfhw->period_cnt * NSEC_PER_SEC,
> + ddata->clk_rate_hz);
> +
> + wf->duty_length_ns = DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP((u64)wfhw->duty_cycle_cnt * NSEC_PER_SEC,
> + ddata->clk_rate_hz);
> +
> + wf->duty_offset_ns = DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP((u64)wfhw->duty_offset_cnt * NSEC_PER_SEC,
> + ddata->clk_rate_hz);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int axi_pwmgen_write_waveform(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> + struct pwm_device *pwm,
> + const void *_wfhw)
> +{
> + const struct axi_pwmgen_waveform *wfhw = _wfhw;
> struct axi_pwmgen_ddata *ddata = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
> - unsigned int ch = pwm->hwpwm;
> struct regmap *regmap = ddata->regmap;
> - u64 period_cnt, duty_cnt;
> + unsigned int ch = pwm->hwpwm;
> int ret;
>
> - if (state->polarity != PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + ret = regmap_write(regmap, AXI_PWMGEN_CHX_PERIOD(ch), wfhw->period_cnt);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
>
> - if (state->enabled) {
> - period_cnt = mul_u64_u64_div_u64(state->period, ddata->clk_rate_hz, NSEC_PER_SEC);
> - if (period_cnt > UINT_MAX)
> - period_cnt = UINT_MAX;
> + ret = regmap_write(regmap, AXI_PWMGEN_CHX_DUTY(ch), wfhw->duty_cycle_cnt);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
>
> - if (period_cnt == 0)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - ret = regmap_write(regmap, AXI_PWMGEN_CHX_PERIOD(ch), period_cnt);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> - duty_cnt = mul_u64_u64_div_u64(state->duty_cycle, ddata->clk_rate_hz, NSEC_PER_SEC);
> - if (duty_cnt > UINT_MAX)
> - duty_cnt = UINT_MAX;
> -
> - ret = regmap_write(regmap, AXI_PWMGEN_CHX_DUTY(ch), duty_cnt);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> - } else {
> - ret = regmap_write(regmap, AXI_PWMGEN_CHX_PERIOD(ch), 0);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> - ret = regmap_write(regmap, AXI_PWMGEN_CHX_DUTY(ch), 0);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> - }
> + ret = regmap_write(regmap, AXI_PWMGEN_CHX_OFFSET(ch), wfhw->duty_offset_cnt);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
>
> return regmap_write(regmap, AXI_PWMGEN_REG_CONFIG, AXI_PWMGEN_LOAD_CONFIG);
> }
>
> -static int axi_pwmgen_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> - struct pwm_state *state)
> +static int axi_pwmgen_read_waveform(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> + struct pwm_device *pwm,
> + void *_wfhw)
> {
> + struct axi_pwmgen_waveform *wfhw = _wfhw;
> struct axi_pwmgen_ddata *ddata = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
> struct regmap *regmap = ddata->regmap;
> unsigned int ch = pwm->hwpwm;
> - u32 cnt;
> int ret;
>
> - ret = regmap_read(regmap, AXI_PWMGEN_CHX_PERIOD(ch), &cnt);
> + ret = regmap_read(regmap, AXI_PWMGEN_CHX_PERIOD(ch), &wfhw->period_cnt);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - state->enabled = cnt != 0;
> -
> - state->period = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)cnt * NSEC_PER_SEC, ddata->clk_rate_hz);
> -
> - ret = regmap_read(regmap, AXI_PWMGEN_CHX_DUTY(ch), &cnt);
> + ret = regmap_read(regmap, AXI_PWMGEN_CHX_DUTY(ch), &wfhw->duty_cycle_cnt);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - state->duty_cycle = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)cnt * NSEC_PER_SEC, ddata->clk_rate_hz);
> + ret = regmap_read(regmap, AXI_PWMGEN_CHX_OFFSET(ch), &wfhw->duty_offset_cnt);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
>
> - state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL;
> + if (wfhw->duty_cycle_cnt > wfhw->period_cnt)
> + wfhw->duty_cycle_cnt = wfhw->period_cnt;
> +
> + /* XXX: is this the actual behaviour of the hardware? */
> + if (wfhw->duty_offset_cnt >= wfhw->period_cnt) {
> + wfhw->duty_cycle_cnt = 0;
> + wfhw->duty_offset_cnt = 0;
> + }
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> static const struct pwm_ops axi_pwmgen_pwm_ops = {
> - .apply = axi_pwmgen_apply,
> - .get_state = axi_pwmgen_get_state,
> + .sizeof_wfhw = sizeof(struct axi_pwmgen_waveform),
> + .round_waveform_tohw = axi_pwmgen_round_waveform_tohw,
> + .round_waveform_fromhw = axi_pwmgen_round_waveform_fromhw,
> + .read_waveform = axi_pwmgen_read_waveform,
> + .write_waveform = axi_pwmgen_write_waveform,
> };
>
> static int axi_pwmgen_setup(struct regmap *regmap, struct device *dev)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-23 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-20 8:57 [PATCH v5 0/8] pwm: New abstraction and userspace API Uwe Kleine-König
2024-09-20 8:57 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] pwm: Add more locking Uwe Kleine-König
2024-09-20 8:57 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] pwm: New abstraction for PWM waveforms Uwe Kleine-König
2024-09-23 13:29 ` Trevor Gamblin
2024-09-26 7:54 ` David Lechner
2024-09-28 13:35 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2024-09-20 8:57 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] pwm: Provide new consumer API functions for waveforms Uwe Kleine-König
2024-09-23 13:29 ` Trevor Gamblin
2024-09-26 7:55 ` David Lechner
2024-09-27 15:11 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2024-09-20 8:58 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] pwm: Add tracing for waveform callbacks Uwe Kleine-König
2024-09-20 8:58 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] pwm: axi-pwmgen: Implementation of the " Uwe Kleine-König
2024-09-23 13:29 ` Trevor Gamblin [this message]
2024-09-20 8:58 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] pwm: stm32: " Uwe Kleine-König
2024-10-01 19:17 ` Kees Bakker
2024-10-02 8:02 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2024-10-02 16:45 ` Kees Bakker
2024-09-20 8:58 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] pwm: Reorder symbols in core.c Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=837e623d-029b-4232-962c-6fb0ba75ca95@baylibre.com \
--to=tgamblin@baylibre.com \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com \
--cc=warthog618@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox