Re: (subset) [linux][PATCH v6 3/3] dt-bindings: mfd: atmel,hlcdc: Convert to DT schema format

[<Dharma.B@microchip.com>]

Hi Lee,

On 20/02/24 1:50 pm, Lee Jones wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> On Tue, 20 Feb 2024, Dharma.B@microchip.com wrote:
> 
>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>
>> On 12/02/24 3:53 pm, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>>
>>> On 08/02/2024 11:43, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 02 Feb 2024 05:47:33 +0530, Dharma Balasubiramani wrote:
>>>>> Convert the atmel,hlcdc binding to DT schema format.
>>>>>
>>>>> Align clocks and clock-names properties to clearly indicate that the LCD
>>>>> controller expects lvds_pll_clk when interfaced with the lvds display. This
>>>>> alignment with the specific hardware requirements ensures accurate device tree
>>>>> configuration for systems utilizing the HLCDC IP.
>>>>>
>>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>> Applied, thanks!
>>>>
>>>> [3/3] dt-bindings: mfd: atmel,hlcdc: Convert to DT schema format
>>>>         commit: cb946db1335b599ece363d33966bf653ed0fa58a
>>>>
>>>
>>> Next is still failing.
>>>
>>> Dharma,
>>> You must explain and clearly mark dependencies between patches.
>>
>> I sincerely apologize for any confusion caused by the oversight. I have
>> organized the patches according to their dependencies in the patch
>> series, but unfortunately, I neglected to explicitly mention these
>> dependencies. I understand the importance of clear communication in our
>> collaborative efforts. Please feel free to provide guidance on how I can
>> assist you further in resolving this matter.
> 
> If this continues to be an issue, I can just remove the commit.

There won't be any issue if both pwm and display binding goes before the 
mfd binding.

Could you please pick the display binding as well?

> 
> --
> Lee Jones [李琼斯]

-- 
With Best Regards,
Dharma B.