From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BE56204C04; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 15:25:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738596340; cv=none; b=a4B3A9FcFoOz7ngf6wzM+XnUKP1m7+O6P+JilQwNIOU4AjVes2km/ebRAxFfNyrAh5OMdZaDFemG2sORfjR5xoTEtj5czwi86btK168KXetDc0HF+ThNefTjO0llsIxKuVysr9rOkF0/cA0e9U6+zHk+UpDsPGt5G2cMuEpj9Kk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738596340; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wRpwTEd72M21DmLzOcouJm+GBzjy+8mSBR6J8Uag0h4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Vl2srzLUxas94VgRiCopb62PPehbV0WifCD8UamATQcKjl21/zlePciePXfyiAbvdTwLo8u39fSjo4j4YqwUXU1PiMNBnfn/azONMtbgP2aOysEqzmsHG5vx5mAewBuGwgcPln92iXkm6xZgbmZLHnqlD06czFjStWilCHRsuq0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: UOU1/cmPSEG1CeOwAhLzbg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 7MQHIseUQ1aLfSzCo2mMWA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11335"; a="41924711" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,256,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="41924711" Received: from orviesa010.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.150]) by fmvoesa107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Feb 2025 07:25:38 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 1sNiTXNJTde1JCqyHDCYaQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: ExALNuoaThe61pnbpGy1jA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,224,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="110128517" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.58]) by orviesa010.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Feb 2025 07:25:37 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1teyKM-00000007s81-23pH; Mon, 03 Feb 2025 17:25:34 +0200 Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 17:25:34 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Cc: Mika Westerberg , Linus Walleij , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] pwm: lpss: module namespace fixes Message-ID: References: <20250123101110.339337-4-u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20250123101110.339337-4-u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 11:11:09AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hello, > > in (implicit) v1[1] I suggested to move the MODULE_IMPORT_NS magic into > include/linux/platform_data/x86/pwm-lpss.h. While I still consider that > a good idea I was overruled and so here comes the variant with the > explicit MODULE_IMPORT_NS in each module that makes use of the > respective symbols. > > I don't have a fixed merge plan for this series (assuming it gets the > expected Acks). Either way (both via pwm, both via pinctrl or the > pinctrl patch first and the pwm one in the next cycle) is fine for me. Pushed to my review and testing queue, thanks! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko