From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mess.org header.i=@mess.org header.b="bArYF0fm" Received: from gofer.mess.org (gofer.mess.org [IPv6:2a02:8011:d000:212::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 072121BD; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 00:37:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mess.org; s=2020; t=1700815072; bh=1Mwv2mZ4G1zj1lW5F8OtJV8zDYDCDU5W1iiA610TS+0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=bArYF0fmeSCcuvIHjsf+Evh/Hm1Kzv6ZSluQtPGq8m7E/HroOIxpfsKiphaoHS5zP pscsNp2UvjO+VRWWEJiKLiIWGF10OJokcKR5tMbK5z4/+aV5sXInIEq4q98Kv2JLbu t1xp3QdP8MdDvyf6mjeUwuW3lECd5s4cqFNuZVdCpZDYaTpEz3VNWuZSeHV0x5tQcx Dv0OOgfq1ez4uH+GDMeI4vrLpD1yZCyDfa/uMFr5ST8HsXZKiUCSczo/0gePhK/i+S ekvXm7tZIwwX73GdoFwoOQh5DlvlAtsBrtDSFPFWEgASRBulHkMqSMAbXmyyLJvmX7 NUDpVb7EtCjxg== Received: by gofer.mess.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 985451000CD; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 08:37:52 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 08:37:52 +0000 From: Sean Young To: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Ivaylo Dimitrov , Thierry Reding Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Improve pwm-ir-tx precision Message-ID: References: <20231123165842.ubmhifvtqd7g6jy6@pengutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20231123165842.ubmhifvtqd7g6jy6@pengutronix.de> Hello, On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 05:58:42PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 08:51:51AM +0000, Sean Young wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 04:16:16PM +0000, Sean Young wrote: > > > The pwm-ir-tx driver has to turn the pwm signal on and off, and suffers > > > from delays as this is done in process context. Make this work in atomic > > > context. > > > > Hi Uwe, > > > > Do you have any comments on this series? > > > > I hope you don't dislike the pwm_apply_atomic()/pwm_apply_cansleep(), I am > > not wedded to this name, it's just me reading the room and thinking that > > would be the most acceptable to everyone - I may have misread this. > > > > Thank you for any feedback > > I didn't find much time to look into it. Skimming over it, I like it. > I'll take a deeper look soon. Great, thanks! No rush just wanted to make sure it wasn't forgotten. Sean