From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52783C433EF for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 11:54:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1344021AbiBBLyh (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Feb 2022 06:54:37 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]:30958 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231839AbiBBLyg (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Feb 2022 06:54:36 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1643802876; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=bL5rgnJNtTCmd2esmcO6OG/N+9v3ttozfnd4SZakfGQ=; b=hcaa9dCAp+0ejVhy5Si3NvBgyZAOq3Yq7JwkNYlaEUnEcJ0B0cFGKL+0X+qKFT0jMmqYr/ 9CRRXeSTTiIWCQp2RDx8U65N6TLrQgm712aZ7hzzEQNhRIZAhI1nFbG8ZRq0mxmyWq9i2/ NR1gv90BlL150MxQnr9KRJaf2kUnWoY= Received: from mail-wm1-f71.google.com (mail-wm1-f71.google.com [209.85.128.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-225-4Uoq02A8P1Ojm6hJje50kg-1; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 06:54:35 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 4Uoq02A8P1Ojm6hJje50kg-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f71.google.com with SMTP id n7-20020a1c7207000000b0034ec3d8ce0aso2382552wmc.8 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 03:54:35 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=bL5rgnJNtTCmd2esmcO6OG/N+9v3ttozfnd4SZakfGQ=; b=2z2mf4Tg+5sV+kH7C9RPR8odp309tPUJgXJdZ1pwnnUNKfej3L5wpzBqxYHrJinawD PABGIbeVRx2F/71zxDYQNUh4xHDTnE44R80GFY6MUwk/uW7XsH4Jl/1O7BHpBDhpFJY1 gsUxCp3nOTRc4mlLELUnXj4FBpr0250mKgp27VuZGlhDOwk7ZXG5/yR/+Pe5o9bQVusW aS1IGc+c3VpKOYoLt2AWW5/CuoxqXcfFzq6iFwwqHLaMDQ/ghMQda26zROvivsHFuHUL sFrrJxWNlzbENy5Gi0kn8kj2YX20RCuVIy+CPO2kvQIO80p8iIrlv2ABxdktUGfBPr2l NqWA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530eq5tWl5re3IK5cmr6xGpwd22VpesCaMRtKm93ZyagdaQpCAOv 7dgb8/qkmyHHLP79QMHGhQ0a7rZGe0egHIPVGBjnN0+N8mQNoOtIYpeEqQA1RbvvWpz0qXZ2CUR TykRTSZsPzENuiyahk3Lh X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:2aa:: with SMTP id l10mr1969719wry.191.1643802874129; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 03:54:34 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy9uaj1noGIyEUrpXHbn9QwweYL02b/7HPtTFauTRqXOp7zTH9jXowWwcKexaK5dPFtRxWRqw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:2aa:: with SMTP id l10mr1969689wry.191.1643802873900; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 03:54:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.102] ([92.176.231.205]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j5sm1444854wrq.31.2022.02.02.03.54.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 02 Feb 2022 03:54:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 12:54:32 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] drm/tiny: Add driver for Solomon SSD1307 OLED displays Content-Language: en-US To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Sam Ravnborg , Geert Uytterhoeven , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux PWM List , Linux Fbdev development list , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Mark Brown , DRI Development , Liam Girdwood , =?UTF-8?Q?Noralf_Tr=c3=b8nnes?= , Maxime Ripard , =?UTF-8?Q?Uwe_Kleine-K=c3=b6nig?= , Thierry Reding , Lee Jones , Peter Robinson References: <51f54519-bb8b-f108-1c1e-4fed101ca5ef@redhat.com> <2f149fef-b991-9e34-98cb-426e561192ff@redhat.com> From: Javier Martinez Canillas In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org On 2/2/22 12:50, Andy Shevchenko wrote: [snip] >> What's your suggestion then to solve the issue mentioned above ? With my distro >> maintainer hat I don't care that much, since the fbdev drivers will be disabled. > > I think both of them can work together. If user doesn't care, the first one wins. > I don't think this is a good idea but as mentioned I don't really care that much since we will disable all fbdev drivers anyway. So I'm happy to allow them both. Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Linux Engineering Red Hat