From: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, khilman@baylibre.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, carlo@caione.org,
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] pwm: Add support for Meson PWM Controller
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 11:14:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a43f6e6e-05f6-cefe-451d-528588b85a8c@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160906090749.GA15644@ulmo.ba.sec>
On 09/06/2016 11:07 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 10:36:49AM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> Hi Thierry,
>>
[...]
>
>>
>> The second bug is in probe(), I understand the point to allocate
>> dynamically the channels and attach them to each pwm chip, but when
>> calling meson_pwm_init_channels() we get an OOPS because
>> meson->chip.pwms[i] are allocated in pwmchip_add(). Moving
>> meson_pwm_init_channels() would fix this, but in case of a clk
>> PROBE_DEFER, we would need to remove back the pwmchip, which is a
>> quite a bad design decision....
>
> Ah yes... that one again. I remember running into that a while ago with
> some other driver. To be honest, I think that's a short-coming of the
> PWM subsystem and the fix would be for PWM chip registration to be split
> into two parts: pwm_chip_init() and pwm_chip_add(). That way, a chip
> would be initialized using pwm_chip_init() where the pwms array would be
> allocated, and pwm_chip_add() would register the chip with the system.
>
> Currently a few drivers might be vulnerable to a race condition between
> registration and implementation (i.e. PWM channels aren't fully set up
> when they are exposed to users and sysfs).
>
>> The smartest fix I found was to allocate channels in probe, init them
>> them attach them after pwmchip_add():
>>
[...]
>
> That's the race I was talking about above. I suppose it's not too big an
> issue since other drivers seem to manage, so I'm going to merge your
> fixed driver.
ok thanks !
>
> Unless you feel like taking a stab at the pwm_chip_init()/pwm_chip_add()
> split, in which case your driver would be the first to be race-free. =)
Having he driver upstream is a priority, but having it completely race-free would be great!
I'll be happy to collaborate to a race-free pwmchip probe somehow !
But there is still a glitch, when pwmadd_chip() returns, pwm_get_chip_data(pwm) will still
return crap until meson_pwm_add_channels_data() is called in the following instructions...
The pwm_chip_init()/pwm_chip_add() would be the only solution !
> Thierry
>
Thanks,
Neil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-06 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-22 15:36 [PATCH v3 0/4] pwm: Add Amlogic Meson SoC PWM Controller Neil Armstrong
2016-08-22 15:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] pwm: Add support for Meson " Neil Armstrong
2016-08-28 16:33 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2016-09-05 9:53 ` Thierry Reding
2016-09-06 21:24 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2016-09-05 9:00 ` Thierry Reding
2016-09-05 9:20 ` Neil Armstrong
2016-09-06 8:36 ` Neil Armstrong
2016-09-06 9:07 ` Thierry Reding
2016-09-06 9:14 ` Neil Armstrong [this message]
2016-09-06 10:04 ` Thierry Reding
2016-09-06 12:11 ` jbrunet
2016-08-22 15:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] dt-bindings: pwm: Add bindings " Neil Armstrong
[not found] ` <1471880193-21879-1-git-send-email-narmstrong-rdvid1DuHRBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-22 15:36 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] ARM64: dts: meson-gxbb: Add Meson GXBB PWM Controller nodes Neil Armstrong
[not found] ` <1471880193-21879-4-git-send-email-narmstrong-rdvid1DuHRBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-28 16:29 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2016-08-22 15:36 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] ARM: dts: meson8b: Add Meson8b " Neil Armstrong
2016-09-07 20:19 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] pwm: Add Amlogic Meson SoC PWM Controller Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a43f6e6e-05f6-cefe-451d-528588b85a8c@baylibre.com \
--to=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
--cc=carlo@caione.org \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).