From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: dongxuyang@eswincomputing.com
Cc: ukleinek@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, ben-linux@fluff.org,
ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk, p.zabel@pengutronix.de,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ningyu@eswincomputing.com,
linmin@eswincomputing.com, xuxiang@eswincomputing.com,
wangguosheng@eswincomputing.com, pinkesh.vaghela@einfochips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Update designware pwm driver
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2026 14:26:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a88fa91a-20e8-4391-824b-8e16c910430d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260307-intrepid-curly-seagull-e036c4@quoll>
On 07/03/2026 14:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2026 at 05:30:00PM +0800, dongxuyang@eswincomputing.com wrote:
>> From: Xuyang Dong <dongxuyang@eswincomputing.com>
>>
>> There is already a patch [1] for the DesignWare PWM driver,
>
> So provide review there instead of allowing Ben to post incomplete
> hardware description which you want to correct here...
>
> I don't understand why posting this change.
I see now Ben did not post the bindings change, so this message here
just confused me.
>
>
>
>> which is posted by Ben and still under review.
>> Based on this patch, this series is a continuation of [1]
>> to add support for IP versions 2.11a and later, which
>> includes support for "Pulse Width Modulation with 0%
>> and 100% Duty Cycle".
But does this mean the patchset cannot be even tested?
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-07 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-06 9:30 [PATCH v2 0/2] Update designware pwm driver dongxuyang
2026-03-06 9:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: pwm: dwc: add reset optional dongxuyang
2026-03-07 13:22 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-09 9:23 ` Xuyang Dong
2026-03-17 9:42 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2026-03-06 9:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] pwm: dwc: add of/platform support dongxuyang
2026-03-07 13:24 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Update designware pwm driver Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-07 13:26 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2026-03-09 9:24 ` Xuyang Dong
2026-03-17 13:50 ` Ben Dooks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a88fa91a-20e8-4391-824b-8e16c910430d@kernel.org \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dongxuyang@eswincomputing.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linmin@eswincomputing.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ningyu@eswincomputing.com \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=pinkesh.vaghela@einfochips.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=ukleinek@kernel.org \
--cc=wangguosheng@eswincomputing.com \
--cc=xuxiang@eswincomputing.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox