From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andre Przywara Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] pwm: sun4i: Introduce (optional) reset support Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 14:05:34 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20180307020719.6675-1-andre.przywara@arm.com> <20180307020719.6675-4-andre.przywara@arm.com> <20180307074516.dbak7ztkua4p7mr5@flea.lan> Reply-To: andre.przywara-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: Sender: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org In-Reply-To: <20180307074516.dbak7ztkua4p7mr5-ZC1Zs529Oq4@public.gmane.org> Content-Language: en-GB List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , To: Maxime Ripard Cc: Thierry Reding , Chen-Yu Tsai , linux-pwm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org Hi Maxime, thanks for looking into this and for the Acks! On 07/03/18 07:45, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 02:07:17AM +0000, Andre Przywara wrote: >> While the PWM IP in the Allwinner H6 SoC is fully compatible to those >> used in older SoCs (H3, A64), it features a dedicated reset line which >> needs to be de-asserted. >> Add support for an optional "resets" DT property in our pwm-sun4i probe >> routine, and assert and de-assert the reset line, where needed. >> This allows to enable PWM support on the H6. > > This isn't optional then. It's mandatory on the H6, and unneeded on > everything else. This is what we should have. So are you aiming at: if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "allwinner,sun50i-h6-pwm")) { ... devm_reset_control_get() ... I guess this is preferable over coding something based on a new member in struct sun4i_pwm_data? Cheers, Andre.