From: "Dan" <dan@korstad.net>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: new features time-line
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:53:20 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000a01c6ef12$0030b640$eb00000a@mine3ad5e808fe> (raw)
I am curious if there are plans for either of the following;
-RAID6 reshape
-RAID5 to RAID6 migration
Here is why I ask, and sorry for the length.
I have an aging RAID6 with eight 250G drives as a physical volume in a
volume group. It is at about 80% capacity. I have had a couple drives fail
and replaced them with 500G drives. I plan to migrate the rest over time as
they drop out. However this could be months or years.
I could just be patient and wait until I have replaced all the drives and
use the -G -z max to grow the RAID to resize the array to the maximum
space. But I could use the extra space sooner.
Since I already have the existing RAID (md0) as a physical volume in a
volume group, I though why not just use the other half of the drives and
create another RAID6 (md1) add that to the same volume group and so on as I
grow. md0 made from devices=/dev/sd[abcdefgh]1; md1 made from
devices=/dev/sd[abcdefgh]2; and so on (I could have the md number match the
partition number for aesthetics I suppose)...
By doing this I further protect myself from possible bit error rate on
increasingly large drives. So if there are suddenly three bit errors I have
a chance as long as they are not all on the same partition number. Mdadm
will only kick out the bad partitions and not the whole drive. (I know I am
already doing RAID6, what are the chances of three!).
To get to my point, I would like to split the new half of the drives into a
new physical volume and would 'like' to try to start using some of the
drives before I have replace all the existing 250G drives. If RAID6 reshape
was an option I could start once I have replaced at least three of the old
drives (built it as a RAID6 with one missing). But it is not available,
yet. Or, since RAID5 reshape is an option, I could again start when I have
replaced three (built it as a RAID5) than grow it to until I get to the
eighth drive and migrate to the final desired RAID6. But that is not an
option, yet.
Thoughts?
next reply other threads:[~2006-10-13 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-13 21:53 Dan [this message]
2006-10-14 0:03 ` new features time-line Neil Brown
2006-10-18 2:35 ` Bill Davidsen
2006-10-19 2:46 ` Neil Brown
2006-10-30 23:19 ` Bill Davidsen
[not found] <45300FC5.80806@h3c.com>
2006-10-14 0:14 ` Dan
2006-10-16 5:37 ` Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000a01c6ef12$0030b640$eb00000a@mine3ad5e808fe' \
--to=dan@korstad.net \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).