linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "GeneralNMX" <generalmx@gmail.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Properly setting up partitions and verbose boot
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:18:31 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <001401c97f08$91205150$b360f3f0$@com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 


Currently I have a very stupid setup on my home server (not a production
machine). I have four hard drives with three different types of RAID
(1,5,10) on them setup through mdadm. I've been using this for a while and,
as you can guess, I/O Wait is a big issue for me, especially when moving
from different RAID types. I ordered four new hard drives to setup a proper
RAID10 by itself and I'm scrapping the RAID1, instead just consolidating /
into the RAID10. /boot gets its own tiny IDE HDD in a hotswap bay. The RAID5
will consume the 4 old hard drives. 

With my stupid setup, each partition gets its own /dev/mdX device. This is
the only way I know how to do it. On the RAID10, I will need at least two
partitions: / and swap. This means it cannot simply partition the entire
disk Would this cause sub-optimal performance? Is there a way to make an
underlying single RAID10 partition and place the file partitions on top?

I also have a second question. When the disks need to be synced on boot,
mdadm just sits there and does the sync without outputting anything to the
boot log. If I didn't notice the activity lights going off on the SATA
controllers, I would think it's in some infinite loop. Is there a way to
make mdadm more verbose? I'm not running my kernel on "quiet" or "quietboot"
of course. I had to use SysRq just to make sure it was really doing
something and not in some infinite I/O loop.

Matt



             reply	other threads:[~2009-01-25 16:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-25 16:18 GeneralNMX [this message]
2009-01-26  1:20 ` Properly setting up partitions and verbose boot Keld Jørn Simonsen
2009-01-26 16:06   ` GeneralNMX
2009-01-27  4:26     ` 'Keld Jørn Simonsen'
2009-01-28 18:13       ` 'Keld Jørn Simonsen'

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='001401c97f08$91205150$b360f3f0$@com' \
    --to=generalmx@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).