linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Donghui Wen" <dhwen@protegonetworks.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Cc: swmike@swm.pp.se, maurice@harddata.com, aradford@3WARE.com,
	bind@swift-web.com, raid@ddx.a2000.nu
Subject: 3ware bad write speed.
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 12:45:25 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <004f01c2f0b3$f72478d0$df01010a@moon> (raw)

Hi,
 We used 3ware 7500-4 as ide raid controler on a redhat advanced server
machine.
(kernel 2.4.9-e12, lastest 3ware driver). But we got a pretty bad write
speed.


Sequential Writes
                              File  Blk   Num                   Avg
Maximum      Lat%     Lat%    CPU
Identifier                    Size  Size  Thr   Rate  (CPU%)  Latency
Latency      >2s      >10s    Eff
---------------------------- ------ ----- ---  ------ ------ --------- -----
------  -------- -------- -----
2.4.9-e.12enterprise          1792  4096    1    8.99 6.920%     0.394
29064.03   0.00240  0.00218   130
2.4.9-e.12enterprise          1792  4096    2   10.55 17.61%     0.637
23474.59   0.00480  0.00218    60
2.4.9-e.12enterprise          1792  4096    4    1.94 11.22%     0.156
1861.13   0.00000  0.00000    17
2.4.9-e.12enterprise          1792  4096    8    0.83 7.171%     0.274
995.19   0.00000  0.00000    12

 I saw a thread (http://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg01762.html)
 discussing the simillar problem by your guys. The possible reason you
pointed out is:
      3ware card has its own caching mechanism to accelerate sequential
write, but combine with linux's
      own VM caching and journaling filesystem, the disk physical accesses
aren't actually sequential.

 I have several questions:

 (1) Does this problem only exists in 3ware ide raid adaptor? We test SCSI
too, it is much faster.
     If it is 3ware's driver problem, scsi raid should have the same
problem.
 (2) Has 3ware fixed this problem yet? They claim they support linux.
 (3) One solution is to setup 3ware in jbod mode and use linux
software-raid.
     what percentage of CPU used if using software-raid? It might cost too
much CPU power
     without using hardware raid.
 (4) Other than 3ware, is there any better raid card supported by linux?

 I appreciate your guys help


Donghui Wen


             reply	other threads:[~2003-03-22 20:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-22 20:45 Donghui Wen [this message]
2003-03-24 14:18 ` 3ware bad write speed Joshua Baker-LePain
2003-03-24 19:49   ` Donghui Wen
2003-03-26  0:40   ` Stephan van Hienen
2003-03-26 15:55     ` Joshua Baker-LePain
2003-04-02  7:20 ` Christian Diehl
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-22 21:07 Rechenberg, Andrew
2003-03-22 21:36 ` Donghui Wen
2003-03-22 23:34 Rechenberg, Andrew

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='004f01c2f0b3$f72478d0$df01010a@moon' \
    --to=dhwen@protegonetworks.com \
    --cc=aradford@3WARE.com \
    --cc=bind@swift-web.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maurice@harddata.com \
    --cc=raid@ddx.a2000.nu \
    --cc=swmike@swm.pp.se \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).