From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Subject: AW: Stupid Question? Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 11:09:39 +0200 Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <006401c4416e$db1215a0$1600a8c0@kessler.local> References: <16561.24317.771846.481608@cse.unsw.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <16561.24317.771846.481608@cse.unsw.edu.au> To: 'Neil Brown' , jim@rubylane.com Cc: AndyLiebman@aol.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids Hi, > > > I feel like this is a stupid question. But I actually > don't know the > > > answer > > > to it. If I'm going to make a Software RAID array with a > bunch of identical > > > disks, do the disks have to have at least one partition > on them? Or can I use > > > disks with NO partitions? > > > > Yes, the disks have to have partitions. When you specify > "make a raid > > out of X, Y, Z", the X, Y, and Z are partition names, like > /dev/hda1, > > /dev/hdb1. You can't make a raid out of /dev/hda and > /dev/hdb - whole > > devices. > > Why not? I do it all the time. > > You cannot get the kernel to auto-detect the raid if it is > made from whole devices, but I don't care much about that. > It works for me. Whats the benefit of doing an Array over the whole devices? Are there any problems, for example that you maybe cannot boot from that array? Thanks, Greetings, Stephan