linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yiqiang Ding" <yqding@rasilient.com>
To: Jakob Oestergaard <jakob@unthought.net>
Cc: raid@ddx.a2000.nu, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is Read speed faster when 1 disk is failed on raid5 ?
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:37:34 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <006501c27eca$3a1f0440$707ba8c0@YQDING> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20021028210240.GB15779@unthought.net

Hi Jakob,

I don't follow your guesses. Why do you think it may be related to chunk
size? Anyway, I'm using 32K.

yq
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jakob Oestergaard" <jakob@unthought.net>
To: "Yiqiang Ding" <yqding@rasilient.com>
Cc: <raid@ddx.a2000.nu>; <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 1:02 PM
Subject: Re: Is Read speed faster when 1 disk is failed on raid5 ?


> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 10:27:46AM -0800, Yiqiang Ding wrote:
> > I had the similar result with IDE drives through hpt374 controller.
Still
> > don't understand why a degraded system has better read performance.
>
> Could you comment on the guesses I made below, relating to the chunk
> size?
>
> > > Other than that... Well, if the parity information is intact, the
disks
> > > would need to skip the parity blocks when the array is read from
> > > sequentially.  With a degraded array, the reads are all contiguous on
> > > the disks - this could be a difference perhaps??
> > >
> > > What chunk size are you using?  And can you try a chunk size that is
an
> > > order of magnitude bigger or smaller?   (might take some time to test
> > > this out).
> > >
> > > For example, if you use a 4k chunksize (I don't think you do, if my
last
> > > guess holds), then try 128k.  If you are using 64k or above (which,
> > > again, if I am guessing correctly, is probably more like what you're
> > > using), then try 4k.
>
> --
> ................................................................
> :   jakob@unthought.net   : And I see the elder races,         :
> :.........................: putrid forms of man                :
> :   Jakob Østergaard      : See him rise and claim the earth,  :
> :        OZ9ABN           : his downfall is at hand.           :
> :.........................:............{Konkhra}...............:
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2002-10-28 21:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <02Oct22.043816edt.62658@gpu.utcc.utoronto.ca>
2002-10-22  9:58 ` Is Read speed faster when 1 disk is failed on raid5 ? raid
2002-10-22 10:45   ` Jakob Oestergaard
2002-10-22 10:49     ` raid
2002-10-22 11:24       ` Jakob Oestergaard
2002-10-28 18:27         ` Yiqiang Ding
2002-10-28 21:02           ` Jakob Oestergaard
2002-10-28 21:37             ` Yiqiang Ding [this message]
2002-10-29  0:30               ` Jakob Oestergaard
2002-10-29 21:05                 ` Yiqiang Ding
2002-10-31 11:56                   ` Jakob Oestergaard
2002-10-10 21:18 3ware 7500-12, bad write speed raid
2002-10-17  8:19 ` Is Read speed faster when 1 disk is failed on raid5 ? raid
2002-10-17 11:52   ` raid

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='006501c27eca$3a1f0440$707ba8c0@YQDING' \
    --to=yqding@rasilient.com \
    --cc=jakob@unthought.net \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=raid@ddx.a2000.nu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).