From: "JaniD++" <djani22@dynamicweb.hu>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAID0 performance question
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 10:44:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <007b01c5f012$89bdebd0$a700a8c0@dcccs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 17322.12373.766596.426816@cse.unsw.edu.au
----- Original Message -----
From: "Neil Brown" <neilb@suse.de>
To: "JaniD++" <djani22@dynamicweb.hu>
Cc: <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 5:49 AM
Subject: Re: RAID0 performance question
> On Tuesday November 22, djani22@dynamicweb.hu wrote:
> > I have already try the all available options, including readahead in all
> > layer (result in earlyer mails), and chunksize.
> > But with this settings, i cannot workaround this.
> > And the result is incomprehensible for me!
> > The raid0 performance is not equal with one component , with sum of all
> > component , and not equal with the slowest component!
>
> This is quite perplexing.
>
> My next step would probably be to watch the network traffic with
> tcpdump or ethereal. I would look for any differences between when it
> is going quickly (without raid0) and when slowly (with raid0).
>
> Rather than tcpdump, it might be easier to instrument the nbd server
> to print out requests and timestamps.
Yes, it is good idea!
I will try it, thanks!
>
> Sorry I cannot be more helpful, and do have a Merry Christmas anyway
> :-)
The same to you, and everybody on this list! :-)
Cheers,
Janos
>
> NeilBrown
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-23 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-18 19:34 mdadm 2.1: command line option parsing bug? Andreas Haumer
2005-11-21 23:21 ` Neil Brown
2005-11-22 11:21 ` Michael Tokarev
2005-11-24 5:15 ` Neil Brown
2005-11-22 15:41 ` Molle Bestefich
2005-11-24 5:25 ` Neil Brown
2005-11-24 7:31 ` Ross Vandegrift
2005-12-15 1:53 ` Molle Bestefich
2005-12-15 4:19 ` Neil Brown
2005-12-15 10:37 ` Molle Bestefich
2005-11-22 22:05 ` Andre Noll
2005-11-26 14:04 ` RAID0 performance question JaniD++
2005-11-26 15:56 ` Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro)
2005-11-26 16:08 ` JaniD++
2005-11-26 17:11 ` Lajber Zoltan
2005-11-26 17:34 ` JaniD++
2005-11-26 19:47 ` Lajber Zoltan
2005-11-26 23:27 ` Neil Brown
2005-11-26 23:37 ` JaniD++
2005-11-27 15:39 ` Al Boldi
2005-11-27 16:21 ` JaniD++
2005-11-27 17:40 ` Al Boldi
2005-11-27 19:02 ` JaniD++
2005-11-30 23:13 ` JaniD++
2005-12-02 19:53 ` Al Boldi
2005-12-18 0:13 ` JaniD++
2005-12-19 11:16 ` Al Boldi
2005-11-22 1:14 ` JaniD++
2005-11-23 10:48 ` JaniD++
2005-12-21 1:40 ` Neil Brown
2005-11-22 1:56 ` JaniD++
2005-12-22 4:49 ` Neil Brown
2005-11-23 9:44 ` JaniD++ [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='007b01c5f012$89bdebd0$a700a8c0@dcccs' \
--to=djani22@dynamicweb.hu \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).