From: "Jonathan Vardy" <jonathanv@explainerdc.com>
To: "Peter L. Ashford" <ashford@sdsc.edu>,
Jonathan Vardy <jonathan@explainerdc.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAID 5 performance problems
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 23:42:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <009c01c2fa29$f7b2d290$2e77c23e@pentium4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Pine.GSO.4.30.0304030858080.20118-100000@multivac.sdsc.edu
> The ONLY reason that I can think of to use round cables would be for
> looks. From a performance or reliability standpoint, they are a waste of
> money. I routinely build systems with dual 8-channel IDE RAID cards
> (3Ware 7500-8) and 16 disks, and ONLY use flat cables.
I use rounded cables in my case for a few reasons:
- The distance between my promise and my drives is small yet the promise
cables are long, the rounded cables I have are 12" long and fit very neatly
- The promise cables had two IDE connectors but I only wanted to put one
drive per channel; the rounded cables are single cables
- Air flow; because of my small casing the flat promise cables were
contricting the airflow quite a bit, the rounded less
- flexibility; I found the flat cables hard to bend in to place whereas the
round cables you could twist easily
I've added a link which should make it clear that rounded cables in my case
are a benefit to me. What I was worried about was that they could be
inferior quality and thus be a factor in my raid performance.
http://www.datzegik.com/DSC00056.JPG
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-03 21:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-03 15:45 RAID 5 performance problems Jonathan Vardy
2003-04-03 18:05 ` Peter L. Ashford
2003-04-03 18:47 ` Ross Vandegrift
2003-04-03 19:22 ` Stephan van Hienen
2003-04-03 19:20 ` Stephan van Hienen
2003-04-03 19:28 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-03 21:02 ` Ezra Nugroho
2003-04-03 21:25 ` Stephan van Hienen
2003-04-03 21:38 ` Peter L. Ashford
2003-04-03 22:09 ` Jonathan Vardy
2003-04-03 22:16 ` Jonathan Vardy
2003-04-03 22:28 ` Peter L. Ashford
2003-04-03 21:42 ` Jonathan Vardy [this message]
2003-04-03 22:13 ` Peter L. Ashford
2003-04-03 21:06 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-04-03 21:14 ` Jonathan Vardy
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-03 19:13 Neil Schemenauer
2003-04-03 19:49 Andy Arvai
2003-04-03 20:25 ` Mike Dresser
2003-04-03 21:10 ` Jonathan Vardy
2003-04-03 21:31 ` Ezra Nugroho
2003-04-04 11:44 Jonathan Vardy
2003-04-04 14:39 ` Ezra Nugroho
2003-04-04 15:05 Jonathan Vardy
2003-04-04 16:01 Jonathan Vardy
2003-04-05 0:10 ` Jonathan Vardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='009c01c2fa29$f7b2d290$2e77c23e@pentium4' \
--to=jonathanv@explainerdc.com \
--cc=ashford@sdsc.edu \
--cc=jonathan@explainerdc.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).