linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <me@heyjay.com>
To: Terrence Martin <tmartin@physics.ucsd.edu>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Which raid card to buy for Sarge
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 22:46:19 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <00a401c4186f$ffd21110$6405a8c0@a30> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 406C6E0F.2000607@physics.ucsd.edu

I think I'll read the how-tos and see if I can't get the software raid up
and running

thanks
Jay
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Terrence Martin" <tmartin@physics.ucsd.edu>
To: <me@heyjay.com>; <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 1:31 PM
Subject: Re: Which raid card to buy for Sarge


> me@heyjay.com wrote:
>
> >----- Original Message ----- 
> >From: "Jeff Garzik" <jgarzik@pobox.com>
> >To: <me@heyjay.com>
> >Cc: <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
> >Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 11:58 PM
> >Subject: Re: Which raid card to buy for Sarge
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>98% cpu doing just raid 1?  That sounds highly strange, even on an older
> >>CPU.
> >>
> >>Typically RAID1 doesn't stress the cpu as much as PCI bus bandwidth and
> >>the drives...
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Sorry, I was unclear.  Currently (without raid) my process maxes out my
cpu.
> >If I move to raid won't I have performance problems?  Maybe all the work
> >happens at the PCI bus
> >
> >Jay
> >
> >-
> >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
> >
> >
>
> AFAIK there is no additional calculations on RAID1 so little or no CPU,
> as long as you make sure your drivers are not in an IDE master/slave
> relationship you will get equivalent performance to a single drive
> system, but with redundancy.
>
> This assumes that the RAID array is not recovering at the time of course
> or doing an integrity check (after an unclean shutdown).
>
> In general though I would not expect Linux software RAID1  to have any
> additional CPU cost over a single drive.
>
> As an aside alone the 99% CPU utilization is perhaps not a good measure
> of your system load or capacity. You should also look at how much IO
> your process produces and also the total load on the system (how much
> processes are waiting to execute).  Most processes if they do any
> significant IO are bound by that, not the CPU. If your process does
> little or no IO I would not expect any RAID config to have any impact at
> all, even RAID5.
>
> see vmstat(8) and uptime(1)
>
> Terrence
>
>


      reply	other threads:[~2004-04-02  4:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-31 15:47 Which raid card to buy for Sarge me
2004-03-31 16:15 ` Luca Berra
2004-03-31 16:43   ` me
2004-03-31 16:58     ` Måns Rullgård
2004-03-31 18:03       ` Ralph Paßgang
2004-03-31 19:50         ` Mark Hahn
2004-03-31 20:19           ` Richard Scobie
2004-04-01  9:07             ` KELEMEN Peter
2004-04-04  4:47               ` Richard Scobie
2004-04-09 11:16                 ` KELEMEN Peter
2004-04-09 13:07                   ` Which raid card to buy for SargeD Yu Chen
2004-04-09 21:52                     ` KELEMEN Peter
2004-03-31 20:42           ` Which raid card to buy for Sarge Ralph Paßgang
2004-03-31 20:59             ` Jeff Garzik
2004-03-31 21:39             ` Guy
2004-04-01  4:49           ` Brad Campbell
2004-04-01  4:51             ` seth vidal
2004-04-01  5:01               ` Brad Campbell
2004-04-01  5:39                 ` Guy
2004-04-01  5:51                   ` Brad Campbell
2004-04-01  5:29             ` Guy
2004-04-01  5:54               ` Jeff Garzik
2004-04-01  5:44             ` Jeff Garzik
2004-04-01  5:56               ` Brad Campbell
2004-04-01  7:49                 ` Sandro Dentella
2004-04-01  8:03                   ` Brad Campbell
2004-04-01  8:07                   ` Jeff Garzik
2004-04-16 14:25             ` Nick Maynard
2004-04-16 15:09               ` Måns Rullgård
2004-04-16 16:29                 ` Nick Maynard
2004-04-16 17:44                   ` Måns Rullgård
2004-04-16 22:34                   ` jlewis
2004-04-01  4:24 ` me
2004-04-01  4:57   ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2004-04-01  5:34     ` Jeff Garzik
2004-04-01  6:39       ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2004-04-01  5:58   ` Jeff Garzik
2004-04-01 12:52     ` me
2004-04-01 19:31       ` Terrence Martin
2004-04-02  4:46         ` me [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='00a401c4186f$ffd21110$6405a8c0@a30' \
    --to=me@heyjay.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tmartin@physics.ucsd.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).