From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David M. Strang" Subject: Re: raid5: Disk failure on sdm, disabling device Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 17:05:43 -0400 Message-ID: <00ba01c5ae6f$c002a990$c100a8c0@NCNF5131FTH> References: <003401c5ae61$d982b5d0$c100a8c0@NCNF5131FTH> <4316050B.1060805@tls.msk.ru> <005201c5ae63$ef23e6f0$c100a8c0@NCNF5131FTH> <43160DF2.6000504@tls.msk.ru> <007401c5ae6a$7e9cd160$c100a8c0@NCNF5131FTH> <1125520778.3194.18.camel@x1-6-00-0d-60-fd-e8-4c> <008b01c5ae6c$e4db5e90$c100a8c0@NCNF5131FTH> <1125521616.3194.22.camel@x1-6-00-0d-60-fd-e8-4c> <00ab01c5ae6f$1bb27410$c100a8c0@NCNF5131FTH> <1125522122.3194.29.camel@x1-6-00-0d-60-fd-e8-4c> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Forrest Taylor Cc: Linux RAID List-Id: linux-raid.ids >> Is there something a little deeper to this error message? >> >> Aug 31 04:48:15 abyss kernel: scsi2 (12:0): rejecting I/O to offline >> device >> Aug 31 04:48:15 abyss kernel: raid5: Disk failure on sdm, disabling >> device. > >This error would make me think that the disk is bad. Have you tested >the disk, or replaced it with a known-good disk? I have removed the disk from the enclosure, and replaced it with a spare -- however; the disk remains disabled within the OS. -- David