From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "3tcdgwg3" <3tcdgwg3@prodigy.net> Subject: Re: Move md raid5 from intel to sparc? Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 12:31:03 -0700 Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <00c701c33050$00057360$7b07a8c0@pluto> References: <3EE74472.9010505@geodev.com> <1055350640.1929.28.camel@langvan.austin.ibm.com> <3EE76EDA.1060000@geodev.com> <1055359074.1929.70.camel@langvan.austin.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: To: Mike Tran , Matthew Mitchell Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids I am doing a sparc thingin. I have to build the disk images on a x86 system, and move the disk to my sparc, for debug/test. Everhting works fine, except the MD's SB. I tweaked a bit on MD driver, then everything is good. I would think that MD should take care the SB format in next release. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Tran" To: "Matthew Mitchell" Cc: Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:17 PM Subject: Re: Move md raid5 from intel to sparc? > On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 13:03, Matthew Mitchell wrote: > > > What _about_ the filesystem and data, though? Some filesystems are > > certainly written in a known byte-order, like ISO 9660. Are there any > > of (ext3, XFS, JFS, reiserfs) that this is true for? Or are they all > > written in cpu native byte-order? > > Just look at the current releases of kernel, 2.4 and 2.5, all of the > above filesytems seem to write metadata using one known byte-order (ei. > always BE or always LE). Now all we need is testing. > > -Mike Tran > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html