* What are those changes for fixing the RAID0 performance?
@ 2002-08-17 18:08 bo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: bo @ 2002-08-17 18:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
Neil And RAIDers,
I have been looking for "what changes are made to fix/improve the parallel
access(?) to disks simultanously?".
I noticed as follow;
Up to Linux2.4.9 it got the same performance for RAID0(2-way stripe) and a
single disk(JBOD),
about 15 MB/sec with DMA on(hdparm -tT /dev/mdx).
On Linux 2.4.10 it improves to about 25 MB/sec for RAID0, 15 MB/sec for
single disk.
On Linux 2.4.18 it got the right performance; about 31 MB/sec for RAID0.
I tried to port the difference on /driver/ide and /drivers/md, but it did
not help.
I think there were changes on other functions to fix the parallel access(?)
to disks simultanously OR
to improve the RAID0 performance .
Why am I doing this kind of homework?
I can not migrate our linux to 2.4.18 so I want to port ONLY the fixes for
this performance
issue. I use Linux2.4.5.
Please help me if you know how I can work around.
Thanks in advance,
Bo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* RE: What are those changes for fixing the RAID0 performance?
2002-08-19 15:01 bo
@ 2002-08-19 15:21 ` Eff Norwood
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Eff Norwood @ 2002-08-19 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bo, linux-raid
Greetings,
I am guessing that this behavior is due to kernel virtual memeory management
and as a result porting may be rough. Here are some overall server tuning
suggestions that include VM suggestions I hope will help you and not require
you to do a lot of porting:
http://people.redhat.com/alikins/system_tuning.html
Regards,
Effrem Norwood
> I have been looking for "what changes are made to fix/improve the parallel
> access(?) to disks simultanously?".
> I noticed as follow;
>
> Up to Linux2.4.9 it got the same performance for RAID0(2-way
> stripe) and a
> single disk(JBOD),
> about 15 MB/sec with DMA on(hdparm -tT /dev/mdx).
>
> On Linux 2.4.10 it improves to about 25 MB/sec for RAID0, 15 MB/sec for
> single disk.
> On Linux 2.4.18 it got the right performance; about 31 MB/sec for RAID0.
>
> I tried to port the difference on /driver/ide and /drivers/md, but it did
> not help.
> I think there were changes on other functions to fix the parallel
> access(?)
> to disks simultanously OR
> to improve the RAID0 performance .
>
> Why am I doing this kind of homework?
>
> I can not migrate our linux to 2.4.18 so I want to port ONLY the fixes for
> this performance
> issue. I use Linux2.4.5.
>
> Please help me if you know how I can work around.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Bo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-08-19 15:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-08-17 18:08 What are those changes for fixing the RAID0 performance? bo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-08-19 15:01 bo
2002-08-19 15:21 ` What " Eff Norwood
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).