From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7168BC433F5 for ; Sun, 6 Mar 2022 15:15:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233692AbiCFPQ1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Mar 2022 10:16:27 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48886 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233687AbiCFPQ0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Mar 2022 10:16:26 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-x42d.google.com (mail-pf1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C87E3FBEB for ; Sun, 6 Mar 2022 07:15:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id e15so10081799pfv.11 for ; Sun, 06 Mar 2022 07:15:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PoosqNS45Nfcc4L8nEdm8S4SyFbRorxpbmChCeAf/bU=; b=YipTuFbyeYjLfjDEKePl2rIGpXDqcZnbahKRRuz9v+4OViRrUEPG0QnVaW1R6/23nT m5wMk3u44ctQFFF8twlyuSoTUGHItwGqn/N4GgiIy7KnM7q7vFxSHzXRfZnLUR1rKWxG Or36YaXGHGgf274j1m2i7/e06EGZAaLd2+te96eD1dLtAvuH+afr97ICtRP6Hy+CB5q4 yeKMYDl0yNWXt33/voPB6NpCT7BNzABdS/oLTgWHf0CieX6/Em0Q+B/XpCsUKTexoJmi kEu+x+RCRguFH+YSbfnrHCqvxcI6ZwmosV+I7EtKTdUmanv+qjAgdZcmA7FPzyC1QcD7 93ng== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=PoosqNS45Nfcc4L8nEdm8S4SyFbRorxpbmChCeAf/bU=; b=Y1Vm3Trswlvqa1MuagyDVUWSSQwk8OYheNe1pfKkOWFWtNLM1GR8YrPd3pFlz2gGXt Kp0z0L29A62dEjIUmTEt5KJO2K/SHZNeTJe/u8ANrw35doD2uEsBLZ676J1ohFTbscr3 hKeKk/KGx5pMUXVhTQCGIiha7J82EU54TvshdPBGLWtb4nYTS5fwfnmz4V8q7jC/9F8O u3+fAv42ulyFCJ1V5Xa+sm6iXqfqtSzF0SDmeKM9GPa/1lbDOLQ6FMvcp+K9r1xdyZLF cCk5b3AnnDZdXtiZQlx61E1EUu2/ClZ3RlCEnjgBXPBU25nxi4bUAZNE96fUpgv739Oi rjNw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532dZmRI6j9cXkVRu1l5QhhIa5o4dwbVJjfHOvtbOWGCaClTOetD tl9MsP2pTPJ+2nS7yOtBk+C++g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx+ay0egToEeW3Jn0HOhGSR25bj4D8JGA6abtl+VToqp6bpkvqyodojIkoeQudhMR6edbcrhw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:86c8:0:b0:37c:9031:c41a with SMTP id x191-20020a6386c8000000b0037c9031c41amr6258790pgd.242.1646579732304; Sun, 06 Mar 2022 07:15:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([198.8.77.157]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 142-20020a621894000000b004dfc714b076sm13062682pfy.11.2022.03.06.07.15.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 06 Mar 2022 07:15:31 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <0143c7fe-6cdb-fb7f-ff94-97eec64ec3e8@kernel.dk> Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2022 08:15:30 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.1 Subject: Re: bcache patches for Linux v5.18 Content-Language: en-US To: Coly Li Cc: linux-raid , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" References: <084b5385-ebe7-5fca-8b56-a66276005e78@suse.de> <3b93c0db-316e-d227-e98e-be7a6f4e2907@suse.de> From: Jens Axboe In-Reply-To: <3b93c0db-316e-d227-e98e-be7a6f4e2907@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org On 3/6/22 7:55 AM, Coly Li wrote: > On 3/6/22 10:17 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 3/6/22 3:35 AM, Coly Li wrote: >>> Hi Jens, >>> >>> I have technical problem to send patches via email this time, please >>> consider to pull the bcache changes from my bcache tree. They can be >>> applied on top of your for-5.18/drivers branch. >>> >>> We have 2 patches for Linux v5.18, both of them are from Mingzhe Zou. >>> The first patch improves bcache initialization speed by avoid >>> unnecessary cost of cache consistency, the second one fixes a >>> potential NULL pointer deference in bcache initialization time, >>> >>> Please take them for Linux v5.18, thanks in advance. >> I can take a git pull, but don't base it on something that isn't a tree >> of mine. If I pull your branch right now, I'll get a ton of unrelated >> changes. > > I see, my for-next branch is not 100% clone the for-5.18/drivers > branch, although the patches are verified on top of it. It doesn't have to be a clone, but you can't sell a pull request that ends up meaning the person pulling will get a lot more than the stuff you just committed. Which means it should've been based on for-5.18/drivers, or some earlier point there depending on when you pulled it. >> If you want to do a git pull vs sending patches, base it on >> for-5.18/drivers instead. >> > Copied. Now I pull my for-next branch from your for-5.18/drivers > branch, and they are same, and the two patches are added on top of it. Thanks, pulled. -- Jens Axboe