From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: djani22@dynamicweb.hu
Subject: perfomance question.
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 15:54:25 +0200
Message-ID: <016001c5a26a$05ad3e40$0400a8c0@LocalHost>
References: <20050717182650.24540.patches@notabene><E1Du4Uu-0006O7-84@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au><009001c58ac8$9ab25d40$0400a8c0@LocalHost><17114.55335.687696.686786@cse.unsw.edu.au><03e501c5a120$f3a79a00$0400a8c0@LocalHost> <17151.60931.26972.713074@cse.unsw.edu.au> <011101c5a187$3bc8cf00$0400a8c0@LocalHost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

Hello list,

I have performance problem. (again) :-)

What chunk size is better in  raid5, and raid0?
The lot of small chunks, or some bigger?

I know it is depends on FS, but I think only the raid code!

Which is better readable/writable?

Thanks

Janos