From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David M. Strang" Subject: Re: MD or MDADM bug? Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 06:08:17 -0400 Message-ID: <01ac01c5afa6$3d4d8690$c100a8c0@NCNF5131FTH> References: <015901c5af3b$e0885710$c100a8c0@NCNF5131FTH><17176.2600.694418.472339@cse.unsw.edu.au><018f01c5af99$0343f6d0$c100a8c0@NCNF5131FTH><17176.4401.418417.56385@cse.unsw.edu.au><019601c5af9b$23d8ce50$c100a8c0@NCNF5131FTH><17176.7326.892297.381537@cse.unsw.edu.au><01a101c5afa2$8b3f2060$c100a8c0@NCNF5131FTH> <17176.9057.119383.787644@cse.unsw.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Neil Brown Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids Neil Brown wrote: > On Friday September 2, dstrang@shellpower.net wrote: > > Neil Brown wrote: > > > On Friday September 2, dstrang@shellpower.net wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Can you run that with '-v' for me? > > > > > > > > > > mdadm: looking for devices for /dev/md0 > > > > mdadm: /dev/sda is identified as a member of /dev/md0, slot 0. > > > > mdadm: /dev/sdb is identified as a member of /dev/md0, slot 1. > > > > mdadm: /dev/sdc is identified as a member of /dev/md0, slot 2. > > > ... > > > > > > and just for completeness: > > > > > > mdadm -E /dev/sdm /dev/sdaa > > > > > > > -(root@abyss)-(~)- # mdadm -E /dev/sdm /dev/sdaa > > Thanks. > > Looks like --assemble is not going to work any more for you. > However you should be able to recreate the array: > > mdadm -C /dev/md0 -l5 -n28 -c 128 --name=md/md0 -p la /dev/sd[a-l] > missing /dev/sd[n-z] /dev/sda[ab] > > should get it right. (You did deliberately choose left-asymmetric I > assume). > > I've put a note on my todo list to test out these failure modes > and make sure it does the right thing next time. Does this mean I'm going to loose all my data? -- David