From: bingjingc <bingjingc@synology.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] md/raid5: correct degraded calculation in raid5_error
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 10:57:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <037b2ecbddfc7710ebf8bb345e991836@synology.com> (raw)
When disk failure occurs on new disks for reshape, mddev->degraded
is not calculated correctly. Faulty bit of the failure device is not
set before raid5_calc_degraded(conf).
mdadm --create /dev/md0 --level=5 --raid-devices=3 /dev/loop[012]
mdadm /dev/md0 -a /dev/loop3
mdadm /dev/md0 --grow -n4
mdadm /dev/md0 -f /dev/loop3 # simulating disk failure
cat /sys/block/md0/md/degraded # it outputs 0, but it should be 1.
However, mdadm -D /dev/md0 will show that it is degraded. It's a bug.
It can be fixed by moving the resources raid5_calc_degraded() depends
on before it.
Reported-by: Roy Chung <roychung@synology.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Wu <alexwu@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: BingJing Chang <bingjingc@synology.com>
---
drivers/md/raid5.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index 31dc25e..98ce427 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -2677,13 +2677,13 @@ static void raid5_error(struct mddev *mddev,
struct md_rdev *rdev)
pr_debug("raid456: error called\n");
spin_lock_irqsave(&conf->device_lock, flags);
+ set_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags);
clear_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags);
mddev->degraded = raid5_calc_degraded(conf);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&conf->device_lock, flags);
set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_INTR, &mddev->recovery);
set_bit(Blocked, &rdev->flags);
- set_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags);
set_mask_bits(&mddev->sb_flags, 0,
BIT(MD_SB_CHANGE_DEVS) | BIT(MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING));
pr_crit("md/raid:%s: Disk failure on %s, disabling device.\n"
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2017-11-17 2:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-17 2:57 bingjingc [this message]
2017-11-17 18:44 ` [PATCH] md/raid5: correct degraded calculation in raid5_error Shaohua Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=037b2ecbddfc7710ebf8bb345e991836@synology.com \
--to=bingjingc@synology.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).