From: Alexander Shenkin <al@shenkin.org>
To: Brad Campbell <lists2009@fnarfbargle.com>,
Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net>,
Phil Turmel <philip@turmel.org>,
Edward Kuns <eddie.kuns@gmail.com>,
Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>
Cc: Wols Lists <antlists@youngman.org.uk>,
Carsten Aulbert <carsten.aulbert@aei.mpg.de>,
Linux-RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: SMART detects pending sectors; take offline?
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 13:50:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <07170cf8-d951-013b-7e67-eee54aa60c65@shenkin.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14f1fce1-2959-e051-f7c8-1d98951d744a@fnarfbargle.com>
On 1/3/2018 1:26 PM, Brad Campbell wrote:
>
>
> On 03/01/18 20:44, Alexander Shenkin wrote:
>> On 12/23/2017 3:14 AM, Brad Campbell wrote:
>>> On 21/12/17 19:38, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 21.12.2017 um 12:28 schrieb Alexander Shenkin:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Reporting back after changing the hangcheck timer to 180 secs and
>>>>> re-running checkarray. I got a number of rebuild events (see
>>>>> syslog excerpts below and attached), and I see no signs of the
>>>>> hangcheck issue in dmesg like I did last time.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm still getting the SMART OfflineUncorrectableSector and
>>>>> CurrentPendingSector errors, however. Should those go away if the
>>>>> rewrites were correctly carried out by the drive? Any thoughts on
>>>>> next steps to verify everything is ok?
>>>>
>>>> OfflineUncorrectableSector unlikely can go away
>>>>
>>>> CurrentPendingSector
>>>> https://kb.acronis.com/content/9133
>>>
>>> If they've been re-written (so are no longer pending) then a SMART
>>> long or possibly offline test will make them go away. I use SMART
>>> long myself.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks Brad. I'm running a long test now, but I believe I have the
>> system set up to run long tests regularly, and the issue hasn't been
>> fixed. Furthermore, strangely, the reallocated sector count still
>> sits at 0 (see below). If these errors had been properly handled by
>> the drive, shouldn't Reallocated_Sector_Ct sit at least at 8?
>
> Nope. Your pending is still at 8, so you've got bad sectors in an area
> of the drive that hasn't been dealt with. What is "interesting" is that
> your SMART test results don't list the LBA of the first failure.
> Disappointing behaviour on the part of the disk. They are within the 1st
> 10% of the drive however, so it wouldn't surprise me if they were in an
> unused portion of the RAID superblock area.
Thanks Brad. So, to theoretically get these sectors remapped so I don't
keep getting errors, I would have to somehow try to write to those
sectors. That's tough given that the LBA's aren't reported as you
mention. Perhaps my best course of action then is to:
1) re-run sudo /usr/share/mdadm/checkarray --idle --all
2) add my previously-purchased drive to convert the RAID5 to RAID6
(using
http://www.ewams.net/?date=2013/05/02&view=Converting_RAID5_to_RAID6_in_mdadm
as a guide)
3) after that, fail and remove /dev/sda from the RAID6
4) write 0's on /dev/sda (dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda bs=1M)
5) re-add /dev/sda to the RAID6
This should get those bad sectors remapped... thoughts?
thanks,
allie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-03 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-07 7:48 SMART detects pending sectors; take offline? Alexander Shenkin
2017-10-07 8:21 ` Carsten Aulbert
2017-10-07 10:05 ` Alexander Shenkin
2017-10-07 17:29 ` Wols Lists
2017-10-08 9:19 ` Alexander Shenkin
2017-10-08 9:49 ` Wols Lists
2017-10-09 20:16 ` Phil Turmel
2017-10-10 9:00 ` Alexander Shenkin
2017-10-10 9:11 ` Reindl Harald
2017-10-10 9:56 ` Alexander Shenkin
2017-10-10 12:55 ` Phil Turmel
2017-10-11 10:31 ` Alexander Shenkin
2017-10-11 17:10 ` Phil Turmel
2017-10-12 9:50 ` Alexander Shenkin
2017-10-12 11:01 ` Wols Lists
2017-10-12 13:04 ` Phil Turmel
2017-10-12 13:16 ` Alexander Shenkin
2017-10-12 13:21 ` Mark Knecht
2017-10-12 15:16 ` Edward Kuns
2017-10-12 15:52 ` Edward Kuns
2017-10-15 14:41 ` Alexander Shenkin
2017-12-18 15:51 ` Alexander Shenkin
2017-12-18 16:09 ` Phil Turmel
2017-12-19 10:35 ` Alexander Shenkin
2017-12-19 12:02 ` Phil Turmel
2017-12-21 11:28 ` Alexander Shenkin
2017-12-21 11:38 ` Reindl Harald
2017-12-23 3:14 ` Brad Campbell
2018-01-03 12:44 ` Alexander Shenkin
2018-01-03 13:26 ` Brad Campbell
2018-01-03 13:50 ` Alexander Shenkin [this message]
2018-01-03 15:53 ` Phil Turmel
2018-01-03 15:59 ` Alexander Shenkin
2018-01-03 16:02 ` Phil Turmel
2018-01-04 10:37 ` Alexander Shenkin
2018-01-04 12:28 ` Alexander Shenkin
2018-01-04 13:16 ` Brad Campbell
2018-01-04 13:39 ` Alexander Shenkin
2018-01-05 5:20 ` Brad Campbell
2018-01-05 5:25 ` Brad Campbell
2018-01-05 10:10 ` Alexander Shenkin
2018-01-05 10:32 ` Brad Campbell
2018-01-05 13:50 ` Phil Turmel
2018-01-05 14:01 ` Alexander Shenkin
2018-01-05 15:59 ` Wols Lists
2017-10-12 15:19 ` Kai Stian Olstad
2017-10-10 22:23 ` josh
2017-10-11 6:23 ` Alexander Shenkin
2017-10-10 9:21 ` Wols Lists
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=07170cf8-d951-013b-7e67-eee54aa60c65@shenkin.org \
--to=al@shenkin.org \
--cc=antlists@youngman.org.uk \
--cc=carsten.aulbert@aei.mpg.de \
--cc=eddie.kuns@gmail.com \
--cc=h.reindl@thelounge.net \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lists2009@fnarfbargle.com \
--cc=markknecht@gmail.com \
--cc=philip@turmel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).