* Soft-Raid 0 Performance | Transfer two Data-Streams (CPU+FPGA) to the same Soft-Raid [not found] <21298bd64ef0dc83b29bd45362ead46c@sw-optimization.com> @ 2017-01-17 15:00 ` Eric Schwarz 2017-01-23 8:40 ` Coly Li 2017-01-23 9:56 ` NeilBrown 0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Eric Schwarz @ 2017-01-17 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-raid Hello mailing list, I have got two questions: 1.) I have set-up a softraid (raid level 0) with mdadm using two M.2 modules. For one module the throughput is ~350MB/s (no mdadm) for two modules the throughput is ~500MB/s which is less than factor 1,5 of the throughput of a single drive. The filesystem used is ext4. Is there someone having some values for comparison? For me the throughput gain seems to be too little. The test was done using a HP Z840 workstation. 2.) We want to configure a softraid (raid level 0) with mdadm which can be used from within Linux but also it should be possible to write data to the raid w/ DMA directly from the FPGA which is also connected to the PCIe bus as a slave as well as the M.2 modules. How can that be achieved using existing kernel infrastructure? Many thanks for helpful replies Eric ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Soft-Raid 0 Performance | Transfer two Data-Streams (CPU+FPGA) to the same Soft-Raid 2017-01-17 15:00 ` Soft-Raid 0 Performance | Transfer two Data-Streams (CPU+FPGA) to the same Soft-Raid Eric Schwarz @ 2017-01-23 8:40 ` Coly Li 2017-01-25 16:49 ` Eric Schwarz 2017-01-23 9:56 ` NeilBrown 1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Coly Li @ 2017-01-23 8:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric Schwarz; +Cc: linux-raid On 2017/1/17 下午11:00, Eric Schwarz wrote: > Hello mailing list, > > I have got two questions: > > 1.) I have set-up a softraid (raid level 0) with mdadm using two M.2 > modules. For one module the throughput is ~350MB/s (no mdadm) for two > modules the throughput is ~500MB/s which is less than factor 1,5 of the > throughput of a single drive. The filesystem used is ext4. Is there > someone having some values for comparison? For me the throughput gain > seems to be too little. The test was done using a HP Z840 workstation. > Hi Eric, Could you attach your testing script as well, than we can have a look. > 2.) We want to configure a softraid (raid level 0) with mdadm which can > be used from within Linux but also it should be possible to write data > to the raid w/ DMA directly from the FPGA which is also connected to the > PCIe bus as a slave as well as the M.2 modules. How can that be achieved > using existing kernel infrastructure? > I don't know such existing kernel code. Maybe other people can provide useful information. Coly ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Soft-Raid 0 Performance | Transfer two Data-Streams (CPU+FPGA) to the same Soft-Raid 2017-01-23 8:40 ` Coly Li @ 2017-01-25 16:49 ` Eric Schwarz 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Eric Schwarz @ 2017-01-25 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Coly Li; +Cc: linux-raid Hi Coly, >> 1.) I have set-up a softraid (raid level 0) with mdadm using two M.2 >> modules. For one module the throughput is ~350MB/s (no mdadm) for two >> modules the throughput is ~500MB/s which is less than factor 1,5 of >> the >> throughput of a single drive. The filesystem used is ext4. Is there >> someone having some values for comparison? For me the throughput gain >> seems to be too little. The test was done using a HP Z840 workstation. > > Hi Eric, > > Could you attach your testing script as well, than we can have a look. Create RAID0: $ mdadm --create /dev/md0 --auto md --level=0 --raid-devices=2 /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdc1 Write to bare RAID0: $ dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/md0 bs=1G count=1 oflag=dsync dd will show the throughput Cheers Eric ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Soft-Raid 0 Performance | Transfer two Data-Streams (CPU+FPGA) to the same Soft-Raid 2017-01-17 15:00 ` Soft-Raid 0 Performance | Transfer two Data-Streams (CPU+FPGA) to the same Soft-Raid Eric Schwarz 2017-01-23 8:40 ` Coly Li @ 2017-01-23 9:56 ` NeilBrown 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: NeilBrown @ 2017-01-23 9:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric Schwarz, linux-raid [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1883 bytes --] On Wed, Jan 18 2017, Eric Schwarz wrote: > Hello mailing list, > > I have got two questions: > > 1.) I have set-up a softraid (raid level 0) with mdadm using two M.2 > modules. For one module the throughput is ~350MB/s (no mdadm) for two > modules the throughput is ~500MB/s which is less than factor 1,5 of the > throughput of a single drive. The filesystem used is ext4. Is there > someone having some values for comparison? For me the throughput gain > seems to be too little. The test was done using a HP Z840 workstation. Can you try a range of chunk sizes and see what difference it makes? RAID0 simply remaps each request to the appropriate target device/offset, imposing very little direct overhead. There may be an indirect overhead as a small chunk size causes large request to be chopped up into smaller requests first. > > 2.) We want to configure a softraid (raid level 0) with mdadm which can > be used from within Linux but also it should be possible to write data > to the raid w/ DMA directly from the FPGA which is also connected to the > PCIe bus as a slave as well as the M.2 modules. How can that be achieved > using existing kernel infrastructure? What sort of help do you want from the existing kernel infrastructure. Presumably your FPGA must already understand RAID0 striping, so you just need to tell the FPGA what devices, offsets, chunk sizes to use. I suspect it would be easiest to have a user-space program query the array and feed data to your FPGA, but as you provide no detail for how the FPGA would be configured, I'm only guessing. NeilBrown > > Many thanks for helpful replies > Eric > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-01-25 16:49 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- [not found] <21298bd64ef0dc83b29bd45362ead46c@sw-optimization.com> 2017-01-17 15:00 ` Soft-Raid 0 Performance | Transfer two Data-Streams (CPU+FPGA) to the same Soft-Raid Eric Schwarz 2017-01-23 8:40 ` Coly Li 2017-01-25 16:49 ` Eric Schwarz 2017-01-23 9:56 ` NeilBrown
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).