linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gregory Leblanc <gleblanc@linuxweasel.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Soft-/Hardware RAID Performance
Date: 20 Feb 2003 10:31:38 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1045765895.2116.2.camel@gregdell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20030220112347.028ef5c0@195.90.31.33>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1143 bytes --]

On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 02:55, Daniel Brockhaus wrote:
[snip]
> One suggestion to speed up the reads was to issue several reads in 
> parallel. Silly me didn't think of that, I was completely focused on the 
> writes, which are more important for my application. Anyway. Using parallel 
> reads (from four processes), read performance scales almost with the number 
> of disks in the array. This goes for both, hardware and software RAID, with 
> software RAID being about 15% faster.
> 
> Write performance on the other hand does not change at all when using 
> multiple processes - for obvious reasons: The kernel queues, sorts and 
> merges write requests anyway, so the number of processes doing the writes 
> does not matter. But I've noticed something peculiar: If I change my 
> benchmark to write 4K blocks at 4K boundaries, write performance increases 
> to almost 300%. This is quite logical, since the kernel can write a 'page 

What was your previous benchmark write size?  And what parameters did
you use when creating the RAID 0 array and filesystem?  There may be
opportunities for tuning there.
	Greg
[snip]

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2003-02-20 18:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-19 19:56 Soft-/Hardware RAID Performance Daniel Brockhaus
2003-02-20  0:03 ` Neil Brown
2003-02-20 10:55 ` Daniel Brockhaus
2003-02-20 18:31   ` Gregory Leblanc [this message]
2003-02-21  0:08   ` Neil Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1045765895.2116.2.camel@gregdell \
    --to=gleblanc@linuxweasel.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).