From: Christian Diehl <christian.diehl@kmstudiosystems.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 3ware bad write speed.
Date: 02 Apr 2003 09:20:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1049268010.670.2245.camel@hippokrates> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <004f01c2f0b3$f72478d0$df01010a@moon>
Hi *
I am using several hardware raid systems based on 3Ware, Adaptec and
AC&NC hardware.
The Mainboard of the test machine is a Supermicro P4DMS-6GM with two
Xeon 2.4GHz Processors and 1 Gig of RAM.
IDE (WD 120 Gig) disks are used in the AC&NC Jetstor III (14 disks) and
in the 3Ware (7 disks). The Adaptec Raids use SCSI (Seagate) Disks.
All these systems show a remarkably bad performance (max. 80 MB/s write
and max. 70 MB/s read, exact figures (bonnie++,iostat) available).
I am using kernel 2.4.20 without any patches (Highmem on / i2o off)
and an ext3 filesystem.
I have played around with different stride settings and block sizes as
well as chunk sizes on the raid and experienced minor differences within
the above limits.
By setting
echo 256 > /proc/sys/vm/max-readahead
echo 128 > /proc/sys/vm/min-readahead
I could convince the 3ware to read data with up to 114 MB/s.
So basically I am experiencing the same bad speeds (especially write
speeds) as Donghui (and others).
It seems to me like there might be a common reason behind the bad
performance. (the VM Layer settings?)
While writing this email I just finished a bonnie++ run on a new
software raid using 8 SCSI Disks:
softr.8disk.64chunk,2000M:64k,13630,99,41206,41,27280,27,15278,97,156480,62,329.8,12,16,1322,81,+++++,+++,29177,99,1510,99,+++++,+++,3981,98
That's an amazing difference in reading speed to the hardware raids
(soft:156480;hard:70155). I will most probably not be able to convert
all my Raids to Software Raids, so I would like to reach a similar
performance with the Hardware Raid.
Any ideas,comments,...?
Christian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-02 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-22 20:45 3ware bad write speed Donghui Wen
2003-03-24 14:18 ` Joshua Baker-LePain
2003-03-24 19:49 ` Donghui Wen
2003-03-26 0:40 ` Stephan van Hienen
2003-03-26 15:55 ` Joshua Baker-LePain
2003-04-02 7:20 ` Christian Diehl [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-22 21:07 Rechenberg, Andrew
2003-03-22 21:36 ` Donghui Wen
2003-03-22 23:34 Rechenberg, Andrew
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1049268010.670.2245.camel@hippokrates \
--to=christian.diehl@kmstudiosystems.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).