From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gregory Leblanc Subject: RE: Software RAID level 1 issue Date: 31 May 2003 13:21:10 -0700 Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1054412470.3969.10.camel@gregdell> References: <1054403067.14818.280.camel@testlin.hades> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-D6/nr9rpSPqdNfRzEQjt" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1054403067.14818.280.camel@testlin.hades> To: 'Linux raid mailing list' List-Id: linux-raid.ids --=-D6/nr9rpSPqdNfRzEQjt Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2003-05-31 at 10:44, Stef Telford wrote: > Brian Schwarz wrote: > >=20 > okay, sorry to start this email with a 'jab' or > tease, but really, this is a linux-raid development > mailing list, not a veritas placement plug list. The FAQ for the list, which is the only current documentation on the topic, states that it's for discussions on "RAID in relation to Linux."=20 So, I'd have to say that Veritas discussions aren't out of place on this list. I did prefer the product plugging disclaimers that came on some earlier mails, but not enough for me to complain about it. If somebody is too stupid to recognize that Brian is a Veritas employee, and is "tooting his own horn", so to speak, well, they deserve whatever they get. =20 Greg --=-D6/nr9rpSPqdNfRzEQjt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+2Q6znAkVXO6fw4sRAo7tAJ0bogQOPr8X96cVbSK1shRYjE+6tgCgiZuK px3kA451Tj59oGwGkWMBino= =Fg80 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-D6/nr9rpSPqdNfRzEQjt--