From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: NeilBrown Subject: [PATCH 001 of 3] md: Handle overflow of mdu_array_info_t->size better. Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 17:02:06 +1100 Message-ID: <1060202060206.15960@suse.de> References: <20060202165638.15890.patches@notabene> Return-path: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids mdu_array_info_t->size is 'int', which isn't big enough for the size (in KB of each component in) some arrays. So rather than a random overflow, set size to -1 when it cannot be set correctly. To update aspect on an array, userspace will sometimes: get_array_info change one field set_array_info in this case, we don't want the '-1' in 'size' to change to size, or look like a size change at all. So test for that in update_array_info. Signed-off-by: Neil Brown ### Diffstat output ./drivers/md/md.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff ./drivers/md/md.c~current~ ./drivers/md/md.c --- ./drivers/md/md.c~current~ 2006-02-02 16:42:56.000000000 +1100 +++ ./drivers/md/md.c 2006-02-02 16:48:47.000000000 +1100 @@ -2943,6 +2943,8 @@ static int get_array_info(mddev_t * mdde info.ctime = mddev->ctime; info.level = mddev->level; info.size = mddev->size; + if (info.size != mddev->size) /* overflow */ + info.size = -1; info.nr_disks = nr; info.raid_disks = mddev->raid_disks; info.md_minor = mddev->md_minor; @@ -3524,7 +3526,7 @@ static int update_array_info(mddev_t *md ) return -EINVAL; /* Check there is only one change */ - if (mddev->size != info->size) cnt++; + if (info->size >= 0 && mddev->size != info->size) cnt++; if (mddev->raid_disks != info->raid_disks) cnt++; if (mddev->layout != info->layout) cnt++; if ((state ^ info->state) & (1<pers->reconfig(mddev, info->layout, -1); } - if (mddev->size != info->size) + if (info->size >= 0 && mddev->size != info->size) rv = update_size(mddev, info->size); if (mddev->raid_disks != info->raid_disks)