From: Mike Tran <mhtran@us.ibm.com>
To: Dick Streefland <dick.streefland@altium.nl>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAID1 recovery fails with 2.6 kernel
Date: 22 Oct 2003 12:43:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1066844591.1260.31.camel@star2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <297d.3f93a033.85d8f@altium.nl>
On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 03:43, Dick Streefland wrote:
> Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au> wrote:
> | Thanks for providing a script...
> | It works fine for me (2.6.0-test8).
> |
> | I don't suppose there is anything in the kernel logs about write
> | errors on loop2 ???
>
> No, there was nothing unusual in the log files. I have no access to
> the test machine at the moment, but there is a message when the
> recovery starts, and a few seconds later the message "sync done".
>
> | Does it fail consistently for you, or only occasionally?
>
> It fails every time. This test was on an dual PIII 450 system, but it
> also fails on a VIA C6 system with the 2.6.0-test5 kernel. Both
> kernels are compiled without CONFIG_PREEMPT, because I had other
> problems that might be related to this option:
>
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg03507.html
>
> Could this be related to CONFIG_DM_IOCTL_V4? I was not sure about this
> option, and have not enabled it. Otherwise, I think it is time to put
> in some printk's. Do you have suggestions where to start looking?
I have been experiencing the same problem on my test machine. I found
out that the resync terminated early because of MD_RECOVERY_ER R bit set
by raid1's sync_write_request(). I don't understand why it fails the
sync when all the writes already completed successfully and quickly. If
there is a need to check for "nowhere to write this to" as in 2.4.x
kernel, I think we need a different check.
The following patch for 2.6.0-test8 kernel seems to fix it.
--- a/raid1.c 2003-10-17 16:43:14.000000000 -0500
+++ b/raid1.c 2003-10-22 11:57:59.350900256 -0500
@@ -841,7 +841,7 @@
}
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&r1_bio->remaining)) {
- md_done_sync(mddev, r1_bio->master_bio->bi_size >> 9,
0);
+ md_done_sync(mddev, r1_bio->master_bio->bi_size >> 9,
1);
put_buf(r1_bio);
}
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-22 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-19 14:27 RAID1 recovery fails with 2.6 kernel Dick Streefland
2003-10-20 6:15 ` Neil Brown
2003-10-20 8:43 ` Dick Streefland
2003-10-22 17:43 ` Mike Tran [this message]
2003-10-22 18:59 ` Dick Streefland
2003-10-26 20:36 ` Dick Streefland
2003-10-22 22:54 ` Kernel OOps: bad magic 0 while RAID5 resync operation Bo Moon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1066844591.1260.31.camel@star2 \
--to=mhtran@us.ibm.com \
--cc=dick.streefland@altium.nl \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).