linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rechenberg, Andrew" <ARechenberg@shermanfinancialgroup.com>
To: AndyLiebman@aol.com
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAID 10 and Persistent Superblock
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 12:33:59 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1067621639.6601.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c6.2446066e.2cd3d85c@aol.com>

I have a 56-disk RAID10 and I have persistent superblocks on all of the
md devices.  I believe the RAID code is smart enough to know that a
superblock already exists and places a new superblock 'before' the other
one.

So the end of your disk should look like the following drawing:

-----------------------------------|
   DATA    |  RAID0SB  |   RAID1SB |
-----------------------------------|

When I created my RAID10 array, I believe that the superblocks were
created in this fashion.  Any RAID guru care to comment?

Regards,
Andy.


On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 10:23, AndyLiebman@aol.com wrote:
> A "simple" question regarding RAID 10. When I make a RAID 0 on top of three 
> RAID 1 arrays, should I use "persistent superblock = 1" in that top level 
> array? Won't that confuse the RAID software by putting two different UUIDs on the 
> drives -- one for the RAID 1 arrays and one for the RAID 0 array? 
> 
> As long as I have UUIDs for the three lower level RAID 1 arrays, I should be 
> able to start those arrays with mdadm even if my device ids change. 
> 
> Then shouldn't I be able to start the top level array without a UUID -- just 
> by referring to the mdX numbers? In other words, if md0, md1, md2 start, there 
> shouldn't be any confusion about which are the correct devices to start up 
> md3. Or am I missing something?
> 
> Appreciate your answers. 
> 
> Andy Liebman
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-- 

Regards,
Andrew Rechenberg
Infrastructure Team, Sherman Financial Group

      reply	other threads:[~2003-10-31 17:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-31 15:23 RAID 10 and Persistent Superblock AndyLiebman
2003-10-31 17:33 ` Rechenberg, Andrew [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1067621639.6601.5.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=arechenberg@shermanfinancialgroup.com \
    --cc=AndyLiebman@aol.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).