From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean-Rene Cormier Subject: Re: Moving RAID 1 array to new server Date: 12 Nov 2003 20:11:34 -0400 Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1068682293.5087.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1068509010.907.4.camel@forbidden.jrc.net> <1068603164.908.6.camel@forbidden.jrc.net> <3015.3fb20027.f253c@altium.nl> <1068667243.1477.35.camel@forbidden.cipanb.ca> <1068680238.5087.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> <16306.59268.973057.368159@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <16306.59268.973057.368159@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> To: Neil Brown Cc: Juri Haberland , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 22:08, Neil Brown wrote: > On November 12, jean-rene.cormier@cipanb.ca wrote: > > And here's my /proc/mdstat: > > > > Personalities : [raid1] [raid5] > > read_ahead 1024 sectors > > md0 : active raid1 hdg1[2] hde1[0] > > 60051456 blocks [2/1] [U_] > > [=>...................] recovery = 6.9% (4162176/60051456) > > finish=30.2min speed=30762K/sec > > unused devices: > > > > It seems to be rebuilding but will it stay marked as a spare drive or > > will it take over the main faulty drive after it's done rebuilding? > > > > Wait 30.2 minutes and see? > It should mark it as a fully active drive, no longer spare. It just finished and it's marked as fully active now, it was the first time I had a to resync an array so I didn't knew how it worked. Jean-Rene Cormier