From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: seth vidal <skvidal@phy.duke.edu>
Subject: Re: raid 0 on different size devices?
Date: 19 Nov 2003 14:22:21 -0500
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <1069269741.6952.33.camel@opus>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311191154050.5855-100000@eglifamily.dnsalias.net>
	 <1069268427.6956.21.camel@opus>
	 <200311192018.14555.dusty@strike.wu-wien.ac.at>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <200311192018.14555.dusty@strike.wu-wien.ac.at>
To: Hermann Himmelbauer <dusty@strike.wu-wien.ac.at>
Cc: Dan Egli <dan@eglifamily.dnsalias.net>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids


> AFAIK they have to be of equal size but as you can create a 27GB partition on 
> the 40GB drive, you could at least get 54GB out of this configuration. 

No. I have a 120GB and a 60GB disk in a linear array working just fine.

it's not technically raid0, but it lets the person do what they're
wanting to do.

-sv