From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH 002 of 2] md: Improve the is_mddev_idle test
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 16:22:31 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1070510062231.20403@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20070510161940.20204.patches@notabene
During a 'resync' or similar activity, md checks if the devices in the
array are otherwise active and winds back resync activity when they
are. This test in done in is_mddev_idle, and it is somewhat fragile -
it sometimes thinks there is non-sync io when there isn't.
The test compares the total sectors of io (disk_stat_read) with the sectors
of resync io (disk->sync_io).
This has problems because total sectors gets updated when a request completes,
while resync io gets updated when the request is submitted. The time difference
can cause large differenced between the two which do not actually imply
non-resync activity. The test currently allows for some fuzz (+/- 4096)
but there are some cases when it is not enough.
The test currently looks for any (non-fuzz) difference, either
positive or negative. This clearly is not needed. Any non-sync
activity will cause the total sectors to grow faster than the sync_io
count (never slower) so we only need to look for a positive differences.
If we do this then the amount of in-flight sync io will never cause
the appearance of non-sync IO. Once enough non-sync IO to worry about
starts happening, resync will be slowed down and the measurements will
thus be more precise (as there is less in-flight) and control of resync
will still be suitably responsive.
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
### Diffstat output
./drivers/md/md.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff .prev/drivers/md/md.c ./drivers/md/md.c
--- .prev/drivers/md/md.c 2007-05-10 15:51:54.000000000 +1000
+++ ./drivers/md/md.c 2007-05-10 16:05:10.000000000 +1000
@@ -5095,7 +5095,7 @@ static int is_mddev_idle(mddev_t *mddev)
*
* Note: the following is an unsigned comparison.
*/
- if ((curr_events - rdev->last_events + 4096) > 8192) {
+ if ((long)curr_events - (long)rdev->last_events > 4096) {
rdev->last_events = curr_events;
idle = 0;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-10 6:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-10 6:22 [PATCH 000 of 2] md: Two more bugfixes NeilBrown
2007-05-10 6:22 ` [PATCH 001 of 2] md: Avoid a possibility that a read error can wrongly propagate through md/raid1 to a filesystem NeilBrown
2007-05-10 6:22 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2007-05-10 7:33 ` [PATCH 002 of 2] md: Improve the is_mddev_idle test Andrew Morton
2007-05-10 9:46 ` Neil Brown
2007-05-10 9:48 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-10 10:04 ` Neil Brown
2007-05-10 12:52 ` Jan Engelhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1070510062231.20403@suse.de \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).