From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 024 of 29] md: md: replace STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL with STRIPE_BIOFILL_RUN
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:51:57 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1080627065157.10707@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20080627164503.9671.patches@notabene
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Track the state of read operations (copying data from the stripe cache to bio
buffers outside the lock) with a state flag. Reduce the scope of the
STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL flag to only tracking whether a biofill operation has been
requested via the ops_request field of struct stripe_head_state.
This is another step towards the removal of ops.{pending,ack,complete,count},
i.e. STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL only requests an operation and does not track the state
of the operation.
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
### Diffstat output
./drivers/md/raid5.c | 33 ++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff .prev/drivers/md/raid5.c ./drivers/md/raid5.c
--- .prev/drivers/md/raid5.c 2008-06-27 16:22:05.000000000 +1000
+++ ./drivers/md/raid5.c 2008-06-27 16:22:05.000000000 +1000
@@ -523,38 +523,34 @@ static void ops_complete_biofill(void *s
(unsigned long long)sh->sector);
/* clear completed biofills */
+ spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
for (i = sh->disks; i--; ) {
struct r5dev *dev = &sh->dev[i];
/* acknowledge completion of a biofill operation */
/* and check if we need to reply to a read request,
* new R5_Wantfill requests are held off until
- * !test_bit(STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL, &sh->ops.pending)
+ * !STRIPE_BIOFILL_RUN
*/
if (test_and_clear_bit(R5_Wantfill, &dev->flags)) {
struct bio *rbi, *rbi2;
- /* The access to dev->read is outside of the
- * spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock), but is protected
- * by the STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL pending bit
- */
BUG_ON(!dev->read);
rbi = dev->read;
dev->read = NULL;
while (rbi && rbi->bi_sector <
dev->sector + STRIPE_SECTORS) {
rbi2 = r5_next_bio(rbi, dev->sector);
- spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
if (--rbi->bi_phys_segments == 0) {
rbi->bi_next = return_bi;
return_bi = rbi;
}
- spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
rbi = rbi2;
}
}
}
- set_bit(STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL, &sh->ops.complete);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
+ clear_bit(STRIPE_BIOFILL_RUN, &sh->state);
return_io(return_bi);
@@ -880,7 +876,7 @@ static void raid5_run_ops(struct stripe_
int overlap_clear = 0, i, disks = sh->disks;
struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *tx = NULL;
- if (test_bit(STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL, &pending)) {
+ if (test_bit(STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL, &ops_request)) {
ops_run_biofill(sh);
overlap_clear++;
}
@@ -2630,15 +2626,8 @@ static void handle_stripe5(struct stripe
s.syncing = test_bit(STRIPE_SYNCING, &sh->state);
s.expanding = test_bit(STRIPE_EXPAND_SOURCE, &sh->state);
s.expanded = test_bit(STRIPE_EXPAND_READY, &sh->state);
- /* Now to look around and see what can be done */
-
- /* clean-up completed biofill operations */
- if (test_bit(STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL, &sh->ops.complete)) {
- clear_bit(STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL, &sh->ops.pending);
- clear_bit(STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL, &sh->ops.ack);
- clear_bit(STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL, &sh->ops.complete);
- }
+ /* Now to look around and see what can be done */
rcu_read_lock();
for (i=disks; i--; ) {
mdk_rdev_t *rdev;
@@ -2652,10 +2641,10 @@ static void handle_stripe5(struct stripe
/* maybe we can request a biofill operation
*
* new wantfill requests are only permitted while
- * STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL is clear
+ * ops_complete_biofill is guaranteed to be inactive
*/
if (test_bit(R5_UPTODATE, &dev->flags) && dev->toread &&
- !test_bit(STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL, &sh->ops.pending))
+ !test_bit(STRIPE_BIOFILL_RUN, &sh->state))
set_bit(R5_Wantfill, &dev->flags);
/* now count some things */
@@ -2699,8 +2688,10 @@ static void handle_stripe5(struct stripe
goto unlock;
}
- if (s.to_fill && !test_and_set_bit(STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL, &sh->ops.pending))
- sh->ops.count++;
+ if (s.to_fill && !test_bit(STRIPE_BIOFILL_RUN, &sh->state)) {
+ set_bit(STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL, &s.ops_request);
+ set_bit(STRIPE_BIOFILL_RUN, &sh->state);
+ }
pr_debug("locked=%d uptodate=%d to_read=%d"
" to_write=%d failed=%d failed_num=%d\n",
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-27 6:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-27 6:49 [PATCH 000 of 29] md: Introduction : patchbomb for 2.6.27 merge window NeilBrown
2008-06-27 6:49 ` [PATCH 001 of 29] md: Ensure interrupted recovery completed properly (v1 metadata plus bitmap) NeilBrown
2008-07-01 7:20 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-06-27 6:49 ` [PATCH 002 of 29] md: Don't acknowlege that stripe-expand is complete until it really is NeilBrown
2008-06-27 6:49 ` [PATCH 003 of 29] md: Fix error paths if md_probe fails NeilBrown
2008-06-27 6:49 ` [PATCH 004 of 29] md: linear: correct disk numbering error check NeilBrown
2008-06-27 6:49 ` [PATCH 005 of 29] md: use bio_endio instead of a call to bi_end_io NeilBrown
2008-06-27 6:49 ` [PATCH 006 of 29] md: Improve setting of "events_cleared" for write-intent bitmaps NeilBrown
2008-06-27 6:50 ` [PATCH 007 of 29] md: Allow setting start point for requested check/repair NeilBrown
2008-06-27 6:50 ` [PATCH 008 of 29] md: Close race in md_probe NeilBrown
2008-06-27 12:21 ` Andre Noll
2008-06-27 23:38 ` Neil Brown
2008-06-30 7:52 ` Andre Noll
2008-06-27 6:50 ` [PATCH 009 of 29] md: Don't try to make md arrays dirty if that is not meaningful NeilBrown
2008-06-27 6:50 ` [PATCH 010 of 29] md: Enable setting of 'offset' and 'size' of a hot-added spare NeilBrown
2008-06-27 6:50 ` [PATCH 011 of 29] md: Support adding a spare to a live md array with external metadata NeilBrown
2008-06-27 6:50 ` [PATCH 012 of 29] md: rationalise return value for ->hot_add_disk method NeilBrown
2008-06-27 6:50 ` [PATCH 013 of 29] md: Don't reject HOT_REMOVE_DISK request for an array that is not yet started NeilBrown
2008-06-27 6:50 ` [PATCH 014 of 29] md: Make sure all changes to md/array_state are notified NeilBrown
2008-06-27 6:50 ` [PATCH 015 of 29] md: Make sure all changes to md/sync_action " NeilBrown
2008-06-27 6:51 ` [PATCH 016 of 29] md: Make sure all changes to md/degraded " NeilBrown
2008-06-27 6:51 ` [PATCH 017 of 29] md: Make sure all changes to md/dev-XX/state " NeilBrown
2008-06-27 6:51 ` [PATCH 018 of 29] md: Support changing rdev size on running arrays NeilBrown
2008-06-27 16:09 ` Markus Hochholdinger
2008-06-27 23:41 ` Neil Brown
2010-03-30 14:52 ` Markus Hochholdinger
2010-03-31 5:41 ` Neil Brown
2010-04-01 15:23 ` Markus Hochholdinger
2012-03-24 20:47 ` Markus Hochholdinger
2012-03-25 22:15 ` NeilBrown
2021-11-10 13:09 ` Markus Hochholdinger
2021-11-10 17:51 ` Markus Hochholdinger
2021-11-11 13:10 ` Markus Hochholdinger
2021-11-11 15:09 ` Markus Hochholdinger
2021-11-12 1:22 ` Guoqing Jiang
2021-11-12 14:31 ` Markus Hochholdinger
2008-06-27 6:51 ` [PATCH 019 of 29] md: md: kill STRIPE_OP_MOD_DMA in raid5 offload NeilBrown
2008-06-27 6:51 ` [PATCH 020 of 29] md: md: kill STRIPE_OP_IO flag NeilBrown
2008-06-27 6:51 ` [PATCH 021 of 29] md: md: use stripe_head_state in ops_run_io() NeilBrown
2008-06-27 6:51 ` [PATCH 022 of 29] md: md: unify raid5/6 i/o submission NeilBrown
2008-06-27 6:51 ` [PATCH 023 of 29] md: md: replace STRIPE_OP_CHECK with 'check_states' NeilBrown
2008-06-27 6:51 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2008-06-27 6:52 ` [PATCH 025 of 29] md: md: replace STRIPE_OP_COMPUTE_BLK with STRIPE_COMPUTE_RUN NeilBrown
2008-06-27 6:52 ` [PATCH 026 of 29] md: md: replace STRIPE_OP_{BIODRAIN,PREXOR,POSTXOR} with 'reconstruct_states' NeilBrown
2008-06-27 6:52 ` [PATCH 027 of 29] md: md: replace R5_WantPrexor with R5_WantDrain, add 'prexor' reconstruct_states NeilBrown
2008-06-27 6:52 ` [PATCH 028 of 29] md: md: handle operation chaining in raid5_run_ops NeilBrown
2008-06-27 6:52 ` [PATCH 029 of 29] md: md: rationalize raid5 function names NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1080627065157.10707@suse.de \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).