linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: rich turner <rich@storix.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: raidtools vs mdadm
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 15:03:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1093989799.3399.27.camel@rich> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8075D5C3061B9441944E1373776451186488CB@cinshrexc03.shermfin.com>

are there any incompatibilities related to mdadm? does it only support
the md driver at a certain level? our software supports kernel version
2.2 and later.

does it fully support creating a raid device on logical volumes, and
creating logical volumes on raid devices? i have played with this a
little and havent seen any problems but i thought i would ask to see if
anyone has seen anything.

would i expect to see the mdadm executable available on most
distributions today by default?

i realize that raid devices created with raidtools and raid devices
created with mdadm can co-exist. is there an easy way to know which
method was used to create them?

thanks for the responses


On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 12:38, Rechenberg, Andrew wrote:
> I currently use a combination of raidtools and mdadm.  I may be the
> exception rather than the rule because I'm currently using an old
> distribution (Red Hat 7.3) because of application compatibility.
> 
> I use mdadm exclusively for management of arrays though (failing, hot
> removing, hot adding, monitoring).  Fedora Core 2 is using mdadm for
> monitoring although I'm not sure what FC2 anaconda is using to setup
> RAID arrays.  I believe it still uses raidtools and rc.sysinit on FC2
> still uses raidtools.  I'm a RH die-hard so I'm not sure what other
> distros use.
> 
> I would venture to say that mdadm is becoming the defacto although it's
> not quite there yet.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org 
> > [mailto:linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of rich turner
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 2:56 PM
> > To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: raidtools vs mdadm
> > 
> > i work for a software company that develops backup and 
> > disaster recovery software for linux. our product supports 
> > software raid, but i must say that we currently only support 
> > it when devices are created with raidtools. i only recently 
> > heard about mdadm and am very impressed with its flexibility 
> > and funtionality.
> > 
> > my question is how popular is mdadm in production 
> > environments as this compares to raidtools?
> > 
> > is mdadm used to configure software raid on any distribution 
> > installations?
> > 
> > is mdadm trending to become the defacto standard for software 
> > raid on linux?
> > 
> > rich turner
> > 
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe 
> > linux-raid" in the body of a message to 
> > majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at  
> > http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > 


  reply	other threads:[~2004-08-31 22:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-31 19:38 raidtools vs mdadm Rechenberg, Andrew
2004-08-31 22:03 ` rich turner [this message]
2004-09-01  0:54   ` Neil Brown
2004-09-09  0:11     ` rich turner
2004-09-09  0:42       ` Neil Brown
2004-09-09  2:56         ` Bob Hillegas
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-31 18:55 rich turner
2004-08-31 19:27 ` Guy
2004-09-01  6:45   ` Gordon Henderson
2004-09-01  0:50 ` Neil Brown
2004-09-01  7:40 ` Luca Berra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1093989799.3399.27.camel@rich \
    --to=rich@storix.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).