From: Mike Tran <mhtran@us.ibm.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: recreate superblock? (was Re: mdadm: failed to RUN_ARRAY)
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 08:42:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1097502158.5815.62.camel@langvan2.homenetwork> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <416AB1E1.1070605@uiuc.edu>
Hi Sharif,
From the kernel log, I believe that the raid5 array now has 4 working
disks out of 6 raid disks. My suggestion is to recreate the array.
Before recreating the MD array, I would suggest that you run mdadm
--examine /dev/hdxx (i.e. hde1, hdf1 or hdg1) and write down the
information of the original array setup.
Some of the important Raid5 info are : Raid Devices, Total Devices,
Preferred Minor (/dev/mdx), Spare Devices, Layout, Chunk Size, order of
devices.
When you **decide** to use mdadm -C to recreate array, mdadm will ask
you to confirm on overwriting existing md superblock.
Good luck!
Mike T.
> /dev/hdi is one of the bad one, but I think it is not totally gone. So I
> was trying to force it.
>
> [root@pep root]# mdadm -A /dev/md0 --force /dev/hdefghi]1
> mdadm: no RAID superblock on /dev/hdi1
> mdadm: /dev/hdi1 has no superblock - assembly aborted
>
> I would appreciate some hints. Thanks.
> -Sharif
>
>
> Sharif Islam wrote:
>
> > Ok, more on this. I think two of my RAID drives failed. and after I
> > posted the email below, I did something that I am guessign I shouldn't
> > have.
> >
> > mdadm --zero-superblock /dev/hdk1
> > mdadm --zero-superblock /dev/hdi1
> >
> > Should I try recreating the array in degrading mode.
> >
> > mdadm --create /dev/md0 --level=5 /dev/hde1 /dev/hdf1 /dev/hdg1
> > /dev/hdh1 missing
> >
> > But I think that only works with one failed device.
> > -Sharif
> >
> >
> > Sharif Islam wrote:
> >
> >> One of my RAID 5 stopped last night. I get this when I try to
> >> restart it:
> >> [root@pep raid]# mdadm -A /dev/md0
> >> mdadm: device 5 in /dev/md0 has wrong state in superblock, but
> >> /dev/hdk1 seems ok
> >> mdadm: failed to RUN_ARRAY /dev/md0: Invalid argument
> >>
> >> Is my hdk1 gone. Should I try to replace that?
> >>
> >> from dmesg:
> >>
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: md: export_rdev(hdf1)
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: [events: 0000000b]
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: md: bind<hdf1,1>
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: [events: 0000000b]
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: md: bind<hdg1,2>
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: [events: 0000000b]
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: md: bind<hdh1,3>
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: [events: 00000009]
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: md: bind<hdi1,4>
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: [events: 0000000a]
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: md: bind<hdk1,5>
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: [events: 0000000b]
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: md: bind<hde1,6>
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: md: hde1's event counter: 0000000b
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: md: hdk1's event counter: 0000000a
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: md: hdi1's event counter: 00000009
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: md: hdh1's event counter: 0000000b
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: md: hdg1's event counter: 0000000b
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: md: hdf1's event counter: 0000000b
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: md: superblock update time inconsistency
> >> -- using the most recent one
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: md: freshest: hde1
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: md: kicking non-fresh hdi1 from array!
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: md: unbind<hdi1,5>
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: md: export_rdev(hdi1)
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: md0: removing former faulty hdi1!
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: md0: kicking faulty hdk1!
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: md: unbind<hdk1,4>
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: md: export_rdev(hdk1)
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: md: md0: raid array is not clean --
> >> starting background reconstruction
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: md0: max total readahead window set to 2560k
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: md0: 5 data-disks, max readahead per
> >> data-disk: 512k
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: raid5: device hde1 operational as raid
> >> disk 0
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: raid5: device hdh1 operational as raid
> >> disk 3
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: raid5: device hdg1 operational as raid
> >> disk 2
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: raid5: device hdf1 operational as raid
> >> disk 1
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: raid5: not enough operational devices for
> >> md0 (2/6 failed)
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: RAID5 conf printout:
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: --- rd:6 wd:4 fd:2
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: disk 0, s:0, o:1, n:0 rd:0 us:1 dev:hde1
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: disk 1, s:0, o:1, n:1 rd:1 us:1 dev:hdf1
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: disk 2, s:0, o:1, n:2 rd:2 us:1 dev:hdg1
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: disk 3, s:0, o:1, n:3 rd:3 us:1 dev:hdh1
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: disk 4, s:0, o:0, n:4 rd:4 us:1 dev:[dev
> >> 00:00]
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: disk 5, s:0, o:0, n:5 rd:5 us:1 dev:[dev
> >> 00:00]
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: raid5: failed to run raid set md0
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: md: pers->run() failed ...
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: md: md0 stopped.
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: md: unbind<hde1,3>
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: md: export_rdev(hde1)
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: md: unbind<hdh1,2>
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: md: export_rdev(hdh1)
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: md: unbind<hdg1,1>
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: md: export_rdev(hdg1)
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: md: unbind<hdf1,0>
> >> Oct 9 10:36:04 pep kernel: md: export_rdev(hdf1)
> >>
> >> [root@pep raid]# cat /proc/mdstat
> >> Personalities : [raid5]
> >> read_ahead not set
> >> unused devices: <none
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >> -Sharif
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-11 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-09 15:39 mdadm: failed to RUN_ARRAY Sharif Islam
2004-10-09 16:38 ` Sharif Islam
2004-10-11 16:16 ` recreate superblock? (was Re: mdadm: failed to RUN_ARRAY) Sharif Islam
2004-10-11 13:42 ` Mike Tran [this message]
2004-10-11 19:09 ` Sharif Islam
2004-10-11 20:00 ` Worked!! " Sharif Islam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1097502158.5815.62.camel@langvan2.homenetwork \
--to=mhtran@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox