From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ming Zhang Subject: Re: More tales of horror from the linux (HW) raid crypt Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 18:26:13 -0400 Message-ID: <1119479173.5501.167.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <5d96567b05061804477325d743@mail.gmail.com> <200506221316.33178.hjm@tacgi.com> <1119474566.11039.12.camel@dhcpc226.office.pivotlink.com> <200506221443.28613.hjm@tacgi.com> <1119477636.5501.161.camel@localhost.localdomain> <59502.10.0.15.208.1119478297.squirrel@postal2> Reply-To: mingz@ele.uri.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-0kPfkjtHuUgZV1NNwtJH" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <59502.10.0.15.208.1119478297.squirrel@postal2> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: John Madden Cc: Harry Mangalam , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids --=-0kPfkjtHuUgZV1NNwtJH Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable it is a sata card right? why u320 here? ming On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 17:11 -0500, John Madden wrote: > > will this 24 port card itself will be a bottleneck? >=20 > Yes. The U320 SCSI bus on which it resides will be if nothing else. >=20 > John >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 --=-0kPfkjtHuUgZV1NNwtJH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCueWFSYbkL5BnVYoRAkYrAJ9FMUrsIhkn1N8pmYjG2vpTFvbH/wCgiMZX +DXAnvMZ2GLNFI0Ar0IXu/c= =cl02 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-0kPfkjtHuUgZV1NNwtJH--