From: Ming Zhang <mingz@ele.uri.edu>
To: Mark Hahn <hahn@physics.mcmaster.ca>
Cc: 'Linux RAID' <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: raid0 low performance
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 09:19:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1120569587.5535.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1120523217.5459.20.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Hi,
With this
-[00]-+-00.0 8086:2578
+-03.0-[01]----01.0 8086:1075
+-1c.0-[02]--+-01.0 11ab:5081
| +-03.0 9005:00c0
| +-03.1 9005:00c0
| \-04.0 11ab:5041
+-1e.0-[03]--+-09.0 1002:4752
| \-0a.0 8086:1076
+-1f.0 8086:25a1
+-1f.1 8086:25a2
+-1f.2 8086:25a3
\-1f.3 8086:25a4
i tried to tune the latency-timer on 02:01.0 02:04.0 and 00:1c.0
individually or both. tried 40, 60, 80. no luck.
so i think it is the driver or card fault. :) thanks anyway.
ming
On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 20:26 -0400, Ming Zhang wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 20:13 -0400, Mark Hahn wrote:
> > > # ./lspci -vv -d 11ab:
> > > 02:01.0 Class 0100: 11ab:5081 (rev 03)
> > > Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV+ VGASnoop-
> > > ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
> > > Status: Cap+ 66Mhz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort-
> > > <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-
> > > Latency: 32, cache line size 08
> >
> > latency 32 is quite low; this parameter effects how long the device
> > can hold onto the bus. try
> > setpci -s 02:01.0 latency_timer=80
>
> thanks a lot for this and i will test it tomorrow.
>
> > and see whether it improves things. I'm unclear on whether a bridged device
> > also needs the bridge's latency setting changed.
> >
> > > Latency: 32, cache line size 08
> >
> > also low. I'm guessing that your bios is tuned for desktop use - some audio
> > setups need low latency settings.
> >
> yes, i guess so, the only drawback of this box is that i am using a
> entry level server box. so its chipset is quite weak and the setting i
> left as default.
>
>
> Ming
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-05 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-01 2:15 raid0 low performance Ming Zhang
2005-07-01 2:28 ` Tyler
2005-07-01 2:57 ` John Madden
2005-07-01 12:41 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-01 12:54 ` John Madden
2005-07-01 13:10 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-01 12:32 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-01 12:55 ` Guy
2005-07-01 13:17 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-01 13:54 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-05 0:13 ` Mark Hahn
2005-07-05 0:26 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-05 13:19 ` Ming Zhang [this message]
2005-07-01 14:42 ` Ming Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1120569587.5535.7.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=mingz@ele.uri.edu \
--cc=hahn@physics.mcmaster.ca \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).