From: Ming Zhang <mingz@ele.uri.edu>
To: Dan Christensen <jdc@uwo.ca>
Cc: Linux RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RAID-5 streaming read performance
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 10:29:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1121264997.5504.29.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87vf3eeqe2.fsf@uwo.ca>
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 10:23 -0400, Dan Christensen wrote:
> Ming Zhang <mingz@ele.uri.edu> writes:
>
> > test on a production environment is too dangerous. :P
> > and many benchmark tool u can not perform as well.
>
> Well, I put "production" in quotes because this is just a home mythtv
> box. :-) So there are plenty of times when it is idle and I can do
> benchmarks. But I can't erase the hard drives in my tests.
>
> > LVM overhead is small, but file system overhead is hard to say.
>
> I expected LVM overhead to be small, but in my tests it is very high.
> I plan to discuss this on the lvm mailing list after I've got the RAID
> working as well as possible, but as an example:
>
> Streaming reads using dd to /dev/null:
>
> component partitions, e.g. /dev/sda7: 58MB/s
> raid device /dev/md2: 59MB/s
> lvm device /dev/main/media: 34MB/s
>
> So something is seriously wrong with my lvm set-up (or with lvm). The
> lvm device is linearly mapped to the initial blocks of md2, so the
> last two tests should be reading the same blocks from disk.
this is interesting.
>
> >> My preliminary finding is that raid writes are faster than non-raid
> >> writes: 49MB/s vs 39MB/s. Still not stellar performance, though.
> >> Question for the list: if I'm doing a long sequential write, naively
> >> each parity block will get recalculated and rewritten several times,
> >> once for each non-parity block in the stripe. Does the write-caching
> >> that the kernel does mean that each parity block will only get written
> >> once?
> >
> > if you write sequential, you might see a stripe write thus write only
> > once.
>
> Glad to hear it. In that case, sequential writes to a RAID-5 device
> with 4 physical drives should be up to 3 times faster than writes to a
> single device (ignoring journaling, time for calculating parity, bus
> bandwidth issues, etc).
sounds reasonable but hard to see i feel.
>
> Is this "stripe write" something that the md layer does to optimize
> things? In other words, does the md layer cache writes and write a
> stripe at a time when that's possible? Or is this just an automatic
> effect of the general purpose write-caching that the kernel does?
md people will give you more details. :)
>
> > but if you write on file system and file system has meta data write, log
> > write, then things become complicated.
>
> Yes. For now I'm starting at the bottom and working up...
>
> > you can use iostat to see r/w on your disk.
>
> Thanks, I'll try that.
>
> Dan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-13 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-11 15:11 RAID-5 streaming read performance Dan Christensen
2005-07-13 2:08 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-13 2:52 ` Dan Christensen
2005-07-13 3:15 ` berk walker
2005-07-13 12:24 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-13 12:48 ` Dan Christensen
2005-07-13 12:52 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-13 14:23 ` Dan Christensen
2005-07-13 14:29 ` Ming Zhang [this message]
2005-07-13 17:56 ` Dan Christensen
2005-07-13 22:38 ` Neil Brown
2005-07-14 0:09 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-14 1:16 ` Neil Brown
2005-07-14 1:25 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-13 18:02 ` David Greaves
2005-07-13 18:14 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-13 21:18 ` David Greaves
2005-07-13 21:44 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-13 21:50 ` David Greaves
2005-07-13 21:55 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-13 22:52 ` Neil Brown
2005-07-14 3:58 ` Dan Christensen
2005-07-14 4:13 ` Mark Hahn
2005-07-14 21:16 ` Dan Christensen
2005-07-14 21:30 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-14 23:29 ` Mark Hahn
2005-07-15 1:23 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-15 2:11 ` Dan Christensen
2005-07-15 12:28 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-14 12:30 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-14 14:23 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-14 17:54 ` Dan Christensen
2005-07-14 18:00 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-14 18:03 ` Dan Christensen
2005-07-14 18:10 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-14 19:16 ` Dan Christensen
2005-07-14 20:13 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-15 2:38 ` Dan Christensen
2005-07-15 6:01 ` Holger Kiehl
2005-07-15 12:29 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-13 22:42 ` Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1121264997.5504.29.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=mingz@ele.uri.edu \
--cc=jdc@uwo.ca \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).