From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ming Zhang Subject: Re: array size Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:15:33 -0500 Message-ID: <1134490533.10254.214.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <439EF06E.7050306@uiuc.edu> Reply-To: mingz@ele.uri.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <439EF06E.7050306@uiuc.edu> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sharif Islam Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids 4 disks, 0 spare, so 3x capacity 586075008 = 3 x 195358336 ming On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 10:01 -0600, Sharif Islam wrote: > Shouldn't the size of the array be around 760GB? It says spare device 0. > > /dev/md0: > Version : 00.90.01 > Creation Time : Mon Dec 12 15:56:58 2005 > Raid Level : raid5 > Array Size : 586075008 (558.92 GiB 600.14 GB) > Device Size : 195358336 (186.31 GiB 200.05 GB) > Raid Devices : 4 > Total Devices : 4 > Preferred Minor : 0 > Persistence : Superblock is persistent > > Update Time : Tue Dec 13 09:59:54 2005 > State : clean > Active Devices : 4 > Working Devices : 4 > Failed Devices : 0 > Spare Devices : 0 > > > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html