linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yuri Tikhonov <yur@emcraft.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, dzu@denx.de,
	wd@denx.de, yanok@emcraft.com
Subject: Re[2]: [PATCH 07/11] md: rewrite handle_stripe_dirtying6 in asynchronous  way
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:24:03 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1141743016.20090116172403@emcraft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e9c3a7c20901151421o69522f71rfe6d7d9621de47eb@mail.gmail.com>

On Friday, January 16, 2009 you wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Yuri Tikhonov <yur@emcraft.com> wrote:
>> What's the reasoning behind changing the logic here, i.e. removing
>> must_compute and such?  I'd feel more comfortable seeing copy and
>> paste where possible with cleanups separated out into their own patch.
>>

> Ok, I now see why this change was made.  Please make this changelog
> more descriptive than "Rewrite handle_stripe_dirtying6 function to
> work asynchronously."

 Sure, how about the following:

"

 md: rewrite handle_stripe_dirtying6 in asynchronous way

 Processing stripe dirtying in asynchronous way requires some changes 
to the handle_stripe_dirtying6() algorithm.

 In the synchronous implementation of the stripe dirtying we processed 
dirtying of a degraded stripe (with partially changed strip(s) located 
on the failed drive(s)) inside one handle_stripe_dirtying6() call:
- we computed the missed strips from the old parities, and thus got 
the fully up-to-date stripe, then
- we did reconstruction using the new data to write.

 In the asynchronous case of handle_stripe_dirtying6() we don't 
process anything right inside this function (since we under the lock), 
but only schedule the necessary operations with flags. Thus, if 
handle_stripe_dirtying6() is performed on the top of a degraded array 
we should schedule the reconstruction operation when the failed strips 
are marked (by previously called fetch_block6()) as to be computed 
(with the R5_Wantcompute flag), and all the other strips of the stripe 
are UPTODATE. The schedule_reconstruction() function will set the 
STRIPE_OP_POSTXOR flag [for new parity calculation], which is then 
handled in raid_run_ops() after the STRIPE_OP_COMPUTE_BLK one [which 
causes computing of the data missed].

"

 Regards, Yuri

 --
 Yuri Tikhonov, Senior Software Engineer
 Emcraft Systems, www.emcraft.com


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-01-16 14:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-08 21:57 [PATCH 07/11] md: rewrite handle_stripe_dirtying6 in asynchronous way Yuri Tikhonov
2009-01-15 21:51 ` Dan Williams
2009-01-15 21:51 ` Dan Williams
     [not found] ` <e9c3a7c20901151351p5e1b4641h1b4c8ba1ae5dcc73@mail.gmail.com>
2009-01-15 22:21   ` Dan Williams
2009-01-16  1:07     ` Cheng Renquan
2009-01-16 14:46       ` Re[2]: " Yuri Tikhonov
2009-01-16 14:24     ` Yuri Tikhonov [this message]
2009-01-16 18:39       ` Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1141743016.20090116172403@emcraft.com \
    --to=yur@emcraft.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dzu@denx.de \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=wd@denx.de \
    --cc=yanok@emcraft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).