From: John Rowe <rowe@excc.ex.ac.uk>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: New features?
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:23:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1162293818.32109.113.camel@kenny> (raw)
All this discussion has led me to wonder if we users of linux RAID have
a clear consensus of what our priorities are, ie what are the things we
really want to see soon as opposed to the many things that would be nice
but not worth delaying the important things for. FWIW, here are mine, in
order although the first two are roughly equal priority.
1 "Warm swap" - replacing drives without taking down the array but maybe
having to type in a few commands. Presumably a sata or sata/raid
interface issue. (True hot swap is nice but not worth delaying warm-
swap.)
2 Adding new disks to arrays. Allows incremental upgrades and to take
advantage of the hard disk equivalent of Moore's law.
3. RAID level conversion (1 to 5, 5 to 6, with single-disk to RAID 1 a
lower priority).
4. Uneven disk sizes, eg adding a 400GB disk to a 2x200GB mirror to
create a 400GB mirror. Together with 2 and 3, allows me to continuously
expand a disk array.
(Not knowing the code, I wonder if 2, 3 and 4 could be accomplished by
allowing an "external" RAID device to have several internal devices and
with changes accomplished the old one to shrink and the new one to grow
until the old one no longer exists.)
Thanks for listening.
John
next reply other threads:[~2006-10-31 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-31 11:23 John Rowe [this message]
2006-10-31 11:50 ` New features? Neil Brown
2006-10-31 12:09 ` John Rowe
2006-10-31 16:50 ` Mike Hardy
2006-10-31 21:41 ` Frido Ferdinand
2006-11-29 1:23 ` mdadm --assemble weirdness? Patrik Jonsson
2006-11-29 2:15 ` Neil Brown
2006-11-29 4:06 ` Patrik Jonsson
2006-11-29 19:59 ` Patrik Jonsson
2006-11-30 22:26 ` --no-degraded in mdadm.conf? Patrik Jonsson
2006-10-31 19:19 ` New features? Bill Davidsen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-10-31 21:43 Frido Ferdinand
2006-11-03 3:39 ` Neil Brown
2006-11-03 9:33 ` Gabor Gombas
2006-11-10 0:48 ` Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1162293818.32109.113.camel@kenny \
--to=rowe@excc.ex.ac.uk \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).