From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH] [PPC32] ADMA support for PPC 440SPe processors. Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 06:55:24 +1100 Message-ID: <1174506924.10836.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20070315232956.37DAB353A6C@atlas.denx.de> <200703170909.13869.sr@denx.de> <200703171943.27465.sr@denx.de> <1174320799.5044.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> <582f77296616b0b85ff7533bb7fea05c@kernel.crashing.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <582f77296616b0b85ff7533bb7fea05c@kernel.crashing.org> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Segher Boessenkool Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Dan Williams , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Stefan Roese List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 15:10 +0100, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > BTW folks. Would it be hard to change your spe_ prefixes to something > > else ? There's already enough confusion between the freescale SPE unit > > and the cell SPEs :-) > > Will you change _your_ prefixes too? :-) :-) Which ones ? I'm not in charge of the fsl spe thingy nor the spe scheduler code :-) Beside, that code is already in vs. new code getting in. Thus I fail to see your point. Ben.